Family and working life 1999
( YAPS - Young Adult Panel Study )

SND- 0786eng

View:

Part 1: Document Description
Part 2: Study Description
Part 3: Data Files Description
Part 4: Variable Description
Entire Codebook

Document Description

Title:

xml codebook for Family and working life 1999

Parallel Title:

xml-kodbok för Familj och arbetsliv 1999

Identification Number:

0786eng-001

Authoring Entity:

Swedish national data service

Producer:

Swedish national data service

Copyright:

Copyright (c) Swedish national data service 2010

Date of Production:

2010-08-25

Software used in Production:

Nesstar Publisher

Distributor:

Swedish national data service

Version:

Bibliographic Citation:

xml codebook for Family and working life 1999, 1st xml edition, Gothenburg 2010

Documentation Source

Title:

Family and working life 1999

Identification Number:

0786eng-001

Distributor:

Swedish national data service

Study Description

Title:

Family and working life 1999

Alternative Title:

YAPS - Young Adult Panel Study

Parallel Title:

Familj och arbetsliv 1999

Identification Number:

0786eng-001

Authoring Entity:

Bernhardt, Eva (Stockholm University, Centre for Gender Studies)

Producer:

Stockholm University, Centre for Gender Studies

Stockholm University, Swedish Institute for Social Research

Software used in Production:

Nesstar Publisher

Funding Agency/Sponsor:

Swedish Council for Social Research

Funding Agency/Sponsor:

Brown University

Funding Agency/Sponsor:

Swedish Research Council

Funding Agency/Sponsor:

Institute for Future Studies

Distributor:

Swedish National Data service

Date of Deposit:

Version:

Second SND edition

Study Scope

Keywords:

labour and employment , working conditions , job satisfaction , children , childbirth , child care , child rearing , marital status , ethnic identity , families , family life , residential mobility , working mothers , parental leave , parental role , household composition , domestic responsibilities , immigrants , women´s role , gender roles , living conditions , spouses , citizenship , national identity , religious practice , educational background , adults , marriage

Topic Classification:

working conditions , family life and marriage , gender and gender roles , minorities

Abstract:

The project 'Family and Working Life in Sweden' (YAPS) started in 1998. The aim of the project was to build up a longitudinal data base for studies of the mutual connection of values and demographic behaviour. The first wave was carried out in the spring of 1999. Based on a nationally representative sample, 3 408 individuals aged 22, 26 and 30 were asked to respond to a mail questionnaire that included questions about their plans, expectations and attitudes regarding family and working life. Factual information about their current situation and backgroung characteristics was also included. In addition to the main sample of young adults born in Sweden with two Swedish-born parents, there was a smaller sample of young adults born in Sweden with one or both parents born in Poland or in Turkey. Out of the 2 273 respondents in the 1999 survey, 78 per cent also participated in the second wave of the survey, which took place in May-June 2003. The second wave also include a new sample of 22 year old individuals with two Swedish-born parents. A third wave of the survey was carried out during the spring 2009. Except information collected through the questionnaires a number of background variables are collected from Statistic Sweden's register over the total population (RTB) and register of education.

Time Period:

--

Date of Collection:

--

Country:

Sweden

Geographic Unit(s):

Riksområde

Unit of Analysis:

Individuals

Universe:

Individuals born in Sweden 1968, 1972, 1976 and 1980.

Kind of Data:

Survey data, register data

Methodology and Processing

Time Method:

Panel study

Data Collector:

Statistics Sweden

Sampling Procedure:

Random sample

Mode of Data Collection:

Postal survey

Sources Statement

Response Rate:

67

Other Forms of Data Appraisal:

The respons rate for the 1999 survey was 67% for the sample with Swedish-born parents, 60% for respondents with Polish background and 49% for respondents withTurkish background. For the 2003 survey the response rate for respondents with Swedish-born parents was 72% - 78% for respondents who also participated in the 1999 survey and 60% for the new sample (born in 1980) - and 67% for the second-generation sample (69% for respondents with Polish background and 65% for respondents with Turkish background).

Class of the Study:

SND Class 2: Only checked. Not processed at SND

Data Access

Restrictions:

Access to the material granted for scientific and educational purpose; SND´s permission procedure.

Citation Requirement:

Publications based on SND collections should acknowledge those sources by means of bibliographic citations. To ensure that such source attributions are captured for social science bibliographic utilities, citations must appear in footnotes or in the reference section of publication.

Deposit Requirement:

Users of SND data are requested to send to SND bibliographic citations for, or copies of, each completed manuscript or thesis abstract.

Disclaimer:

The original collector of the data, SND, and the relevant funding agency bear no responsibility for uses of this collection or for interpretations or inferences based upon such uses. According to an agreement between the principal investigator and SND this study can be disseminated to and analyzed by researchers on condition that the usage is for research purpose. The code of ethics for humanities and social sciences research established in 1990 by the Swedish Council for Research in the Humanities and Social Science, and published in HSFR ethics, must be adhered to wherever applicable.

Other Study Description Materials

Related Materials

Title:

Codebook in Swedish

http://www.snd.gu.se/en/catalogue/file/838

Title:

Codebook in Swedish and English

http://www.snd.gu.se/en/catalogue/file/847

Title:

Questionnaire Poland/Turkey

http://www.snd.gu.se/en/catalogue/file/1367

Title:

Questionnaire Sweden

http://www.snd.gu.se/en/catalogue/file/1368

Related Publications

Title:

Gender equality, parenthood attitudes, and first births in Sweden

Title:

Integrating the Second Generation: gender and Family Attitudes in Early Adulthood in Sweden

Title:

Immigration, Gender and Family Transitions to Adulthood in Sweden

Title:

Childhood family structure and routes out of the parental home in Sweden

Title:

Cohabitation and marriage among young adults in Sweden: Attitudes, expectations and Plans

Title:

Unga vuxnas syn på familj och arbete: rapport från en enkätundersökning

Title:

Unga vuxnas syn på familj och arbete: rapport från en enkätundersökning

File Description

File: se.gu.snd.ddi.0786-001eng.NSDstat

  • Number of cases: 2820

  • No. of variables per record: 440

  • Type of File: NSDstat 200501

Variable Description

Variable Groups

Background variables

Variables within Background variables

Cohabitation/marriage history

Variables within Cohabitation/marriage history

Child history

Variables within Child history

Attitudes on adulthood, gender roles, family and living conditions

Variables within Attitudes on adulthood, gender roles, family and living conditions

Parents and upbringing

Variables within Parents and upbringing

Children and earlier relations

Variables within Children and earlier relations

Employment and work

Variables within Employment and work

Attitudes on work, children, relations etc.

Variables within Attitudes on work, children, relations etc.

Present cohabitation/marriage

Variables within Present cohabitation/marriage

Question to respondents with one or both parents from Poland or Turkey

Variables within Question to respondents with one or both parents from Poland or Turkey

Variables


ID-number


ID-number

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-2820

Summary Statistics: Valid 2820 ; Min. 1 ; Max. 2820

Variable Format: numeric


Year of birth


Year of birth

Value

Label

Frequency

68.

1968

740

72.

1972

973

76.

1976

1107

Range of Valid Data Values: 68-76

Summary Statistics: Valid 2820 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Gender


Gender

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Man

1320

2.

Woman

1500

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-2

Summary Statistics: Valid 2820 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Ethnic background


Ethnic background

Value

Label

Frequency

0.

Swedish

2283

1.

Polish

322

2.

Turkish

210

3.

Polish or Turkish

5

Range of Valid Data Values: 0-3

Summary Statistics: Valid 2820 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Respondent also participated in the year 2003 study


Respondent also participated in the year 2003 study

Value

Label

Frequency

0.

No

731

1.

Yes

2089

Range of Valid Data Values: 0-1

Summary Statistics: Valid 2820 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Age 1999


Age 1999

Value

Label

Frequency

22.

22 years

1107

26.

26 years

973

30.

30 years

740

Range of Valid Data Values: 22-30

Summary Statistics: Valid 2820 ;

Variable Format: numeric


H-region 99


H-region 99

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Stockholm/Södertälje

621

3.

Bigger cities

1009

4.

Mellanbygden

427

5.

Tätbygden

136

6.

Rural area

87

8.

Göteborg

289

9.

Malmö/Lund/Trelleborg

232

99.

Unknown

19

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-9

Range of Invalid Data Values: 99

Summary Statistics: Valid 2801 ;

Variable Format: numeric


National area 1999


National area 1999

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Stockholm

629

2.

Eastern Midsweden

460

3.

Smaland

221

4.

Southern Sweden

466

5.

Western Sweden

554

6.

Northern Midsweden

210

7.

Mid Norrland

105

8.

Upper Norrland

156

9.

Unknown

19

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-8

Range of Invalid Data Values: 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 2801 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Occupation (SEI) (Q47a)


Occupation (SEI) (Q47a)

Value

Label

Frequency

11.

Unskilled employees in goods production

201

12.

Unskilled employees in service production

594

21.

Skilled employees in goods production

239

22.

Skilled employees in service production

209

33.

Assistant non-manual employees, lower level I

160

36.

Assistant non-manual employees, lower level II

245

46.

Intermediate non-manual employees

508

56.

Professionals and other higher non-manual employees

237

57.

Upper-level executives

5

60.

Self-employed professionals

5

79.

Entrepeneurs

82

89.

Farmers

5

94.

94

3

98.

98

144

99.

99

12

Sysmiss.

171

Range of Valid Data Values: 11-99

Summary Statistics: Valid 2649 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Occupation (SEI), father (Q22a)


Occupation (SEI), father (Q22a)

Value

Label

Frequency

11.

Unskilled employees in goods production

168

12.

Unskilled employees in service production

200

21.

Skilled employees in goods production

215

22.

Skilled employees in service production

26

33.

Assistant non-manual employees, lower level I

32

36.

Assistant non-manual employees, lower level II

110

46.

Intermediate non-manual employees

242

56.

Professionals and other higher non-manual employees

163

57.

Upper-level executives

24

60.

Self-employed professionals

13

79.

Entrepeneurs

206

89.

Farmers

33

93.

93

2

94.

94

2

95.

95

2

97.

97

5

99.

99

42

Sysmiss.

1335

Range of Valid Data Values: 11-99

Summary Statistics: Valid 1485 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Influx code 1999


Influx code 1999

Value

Label

Frequency

10.

April

1609

15.

April

499

16.

May

169

17.

April

399

18.

May

67

19.

May

14

99.

Unknown

63

Range of Valid Data Values: 10-19

Range of Invalid Data Values: 99

Summary Statistics: Valid 2757 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Income for 1999 in thousands of SEK


Income for 1999 in thousands of SEK

Range of Valid Data Values: 0-600

Summary Statistics: Valid 2800 ; Min. 0 ; Max. 600 ; Mean 100.888 ; StDev 79.258

Variable Format: numeric


Content of education (1999)


Content of education (1999)

Value

Label

Frequency

0.

Allmän grundutbildning

627

1.

Estetisk, humanistisk och religiös verksamhet

169

2.

Pedagogisk utbildning

110

3.

Förvaltning, handel, kontor, ekonomi, samhällsvetenskap, bet

652

4.

Industri, hantverk, teknik, naturvetenskap

685

5.

Transport och kommunikation

15

6.

Vård

254

7.

Lantbruk, trädgård, skogsbruk och fiske

46

8.

Serviceyrken, civil bevakning och militärtjänst

100

9.

Utbildning ej hänförlig till specifik huvudgrupp/Okänd

162

Range of Valid Data Values: 0-8

Range of Invalid Data Values: 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 2658 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Level of education 1999


Level of education 1999

Value

Label

Frequency

0.

Utbildning saknas

9

1.

Kortare än 9 år

0

2.

Grundskola

266

3.

Gymnasial, högst 2år

686

4.

Gymnasial, 3år

1025

5.

Eftergymnasial, <3år

615

6.

Eftergymnasial, >=3år

189

7.

Forskarutbildning

1

9.

Uppgift saknas

29

Range of Valid Data Values: 0-7

Range of Invalid Data Values: 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 2791 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Home when growing up (Q10)


Home when growing up (Q10)

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Stockholm/Gothenburg/Malmö: inner city

143

2.

Stockholm/Gothenburg/Malmö: suburb

644

3.

Small/medium size town or city

1513

4.

Rural area (Sweden)

470

5.

Abroad: big city

16

6.

Abroad: small or medium size town or city

6

7.

Rural area (abroad)

0

9.

Missing

28

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-7

Range of Invalid Data Values: 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 2792 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Family's economic situation growing up (Q11)


Family's economic situation growing up (Q11)

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Mostly very good

560

2.

Mostly rather good

1707

3.

Mostly rather bad

393

4.

Don't know

101

9.

Missing

59

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-8

Range of Invalid Data Values: 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 2761 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Parents married (Q12)


Parents married (Q12)

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Yes

1799

2.

Not any more

729

3.

They never married

233

4.

Don't know

7

9.

Missing

52

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-4

Range of Invalid Data Values: 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 2768 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Parents lived together during R's upbringing (Q13)


Parents lived together during upbringing (Q13)

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Yes

2070

2.

No

742

9.

Missing

8

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-2

Range of Invalid Data Values: 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 2812 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Why not? (Q14)


Why not? (Q14)

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

My parents divorced/moved apart

601

2.

Mother and/or father died

60

3.

They never lived together

44

4.

Other

26

9.

Missing/does not apply

2089

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-4

Range of Invalid Data Values: 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 731 ;

Variable Format: numeric


R:s age when parents got divorced/moved apart (Q15)


R:s age when parents got divorced/moved apart (Q15)

Value

Label

Frequency

0.

0

10

1.

1

49

2.

2

54

3.

3

48

4.

4

48

5.

5

48

6.

6

52

7.

7

44

8.

8

38

9.

9

36

10.

10

50

11.

11

33

12.

12

49

13.

13

47

14.

14

35

15.

15

27

16.

16

12

17.

17

8

18.

18

3

19.

19

2

20.

20

3

21.

21

3

22.

22

3

23.

23

3

24.

24

4

25.

25

2

26.

26

1

28.

28

1

29.

29

1

Range of Valid Data Values: 0-29

Summary Statistics: Valid 714 ; Min. 0 ; Max. 29 ; Mean 8.186 ; StDev 5.245

Variable Format: numeric


R then lived with (Q16)


R then lived with (Q16)

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Mainly with mother

429

2.

Mainly with father

74

3.

Mainly with mother and stepfather

159

4.

Mainly with father and stepmother

23

5.

Equally with my mother and father

37

6.

With neither of my parents

34

9.

Missing/does not apply

2064

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-9

Summary Statistics: Valid 2820 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Siblings (Q17a)


Siblings (Q17a)

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

No

171

2.

Yes

2559

9.

Missing

90

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-2

Range of Invalid Data Values: 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 2730 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Number of full siblings (Q17b)


Number of full siblings (Q17b)

Value

Label

Frequency

0.

0

367

1.

1

1244

2.

2

709

3.

3

222

4.

4

91

5.

5

24

6.

6

19

7.

7

11

8.

8

3

9.

9

1

11.

11

1

Sysmiss.

128

Range of Valid Data Values: 0-11

Summary Statistics: Valid 2692 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Number of half siblings (Q17b)


Number of half siblings (Q17b)

Value

Label

Frequency

0.

0

1861

1.

1

257

2.

2

162

3.

3

69

4.

4

52

5.

5

13

6.

6

12

7.

7

8

8.

8

2

9.

9

2

11.

11

1

19.

19

1

Sysmiss.

380

Range of Valid Data Values: 0-19

Summary Statistics: Valid 2440 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Number of "step"- or fostersiblings (Q17b)


Number of "step"- or fostersiblings (Q17b)

Value

Label

Frequency

0.

0

2112

1.

1

81

2.

2

80

3.

3

38

4.

4

11

5.

5

5

6.

6

1

7.

7

2

9.

9

1

Sysmiss.

489

Range of Valid Data Values: 0-9

Summary Statistics: Valid 2331 ;

Variable Format: numeric


R has moved away from parental home (Q18)


R has moved away from parental home (Q18)

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Yes

2263

2.

No

220

9.

Missing

337

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-2

Range of Invalid Data Values: 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 2483 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Age when R moved away from parental home (Q18)


Age when R moved away from parental home (Q18)

Value

Label

Frequency

10.

10

1

12.

12

1

14.

14

7

15.

15

41

16.

16

205

17.

17

177

18.

18

497

19.

19

571

20.

20

488

21.

21

284

22.

22

171

23.

23

73

24.

24

30

25.

25

25

26.

26

12

27.

27

5

Sysmiss.

232

Range of Valid Data Values: 10-27

Summary Statistics: Valid 2588 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Day when father immigrated


Day when father immigrated

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

1

8

2.

2

4

3.

3

7

4.

4

7

5.

5

9

6.

6

11

7.

7

11

8.

8

10

9.

9

18

10.

10

11

11.

11

11

12.

12

12

13.

13

13

14.

14

11

15.

15

15

16.

16

10

17.

17

14

18.

18

10

19.

19

9

20.

20

10

21.

21

11

22.

22

8

23.

23

12

24.

24

11

25.

25

9

26.

26

11

27.

27

10

28.

28

16

29.

29

10

30.

30

7

31.

31

9

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-31

Summary Statistics: Valid 325 ; Min. 1 ; Max. 31 ; Mean 16.375 ; StDev 8.416

Variable Format: numeric


Day when mother immigrated


Day when mother immigrated

Value

Label

Frequency

0.

0

1

1.

1

16

2.

2

14

3.

3

13

4.

4

10

5.

5

13

6.

6

10

7.

7

14

8.

8

11

9.

9

13

10.

10

9

11.

11

16

12.

12

12

13.

13

10

14.

14

13

15.

15

16

16.

16

18

17.

17

15

18.

18

13

19.

19

9

20.

20

13

21.

21

13

22.

22

15

23.

23

16

24.

24

16

25.

25

19

26.

26

13

27.

27

13

28.

28

14

29.

29

9

30.

30

14

31.

31

10

Range of Valid Data Values: 0-31

Summary Statistics: Valid 411 ; Min. 0 ; Max. 31 ; Mean 16.114 ; StDev 8.879

Variable Format: numeric


Month when father immigrated


Month when father immigrated

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

January

28

2.

February

23

3.

March

32

4.

April

31

5.

May

26

6.

June

13

7.

July

20

8.

August

27

9.

September

29

10.

October

34

11.

November

29

12.

December

33

Sysmiss.

2495

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-12

Summary Statistics: Valid 325 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Month when mother immigrated


Month when mother immigrated

Value

Label

Frequency

0.

1

1.

January

32

2.

February

29

3.

March

45

4.

April

29

5.

May

30

6.

June

23

7.

July

29

8.

August

45

9.

September

41

10.

October

36

11.

November

36

12.

December

35

Sysmiss.

2409

Range of Valid Data Values: 0-12

Summary Statistics: Valid 411 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Year when father immigrated


Year when father immigrated

Value

Label

Frequency

1947.

1947

1

1948.

1948

3

1949.

1949

2

1950.

1950

3

1951.

1951

1

1954.

1954

2

1958.

1958

2

1960.

1960

4

1961.

1961

1

1962.

1962

3

1963.

1963

4

1964.

1964

5

1965.

1965

13

1966.

1966

29

1967.

1967

20

1968.

1968

9

1969.

1969

26

1970.

1970

40

1971.

1971

15

1972.

1972

17

1973.

1973

18

1974.

1974

12

1975.

1975

15

1976.

1976

43

1977.

1977

6

1978.

1978

5

1979.

1979

2

1980.

1980

1

1981.

1981

3

1982.

1982

1

1983.

1983

1

1984.

1984

1

1985.

1985

1

1986.

1986

3

1987.

1987

3

1988.

1988

1

1990.

1990

1

1992.

1992

1

1994.

1994

2

1995.

1995

3

1997.

1997

1

1998.

1998

1

Range of Valid Data Values: 1947-1998

Summary Statistics: Valid 325 ; Min. 1947 ; Max. 1998 ; Mean 1971.034 ; StDev 7.592

Variable Format: numeric


Year when mother immigrated


Year when mother immigrated

Value

Label

Frequency

1947.

1947

3

1948.

1948

2

1949.

1949

1

1950.

1950

1

1951.

1951

1

1952.

1952

1

1953.

1953

1

1955.

1955

3

1957.

1957

5

1958.

1958

1

1962.

1962

4

1963.

1963

7

1965.

1965

6

1966.

1966

6

1967.

1967

10

1968.

1968

19

1969.

1969

22

1970.

1970

53

1971.

1971

49

1972.

1972

44

1973.

1973

26

1974.

1974

27

1975.

1975

27

1976.

1976

66

1977.

1977

9

1978.

1978

3

1982.

1982

1

1984.

1984

1

1985.

1985

1

1987.

1987

3

1990.

1990

2

1991.

1991

1

1994.

1994

1

1995.

1995

3

1999.

1999

1

Range of Valid Data Values: 1947-1999

Summary Statistics: Valid 411 ; Min. 1947 ; Max. 1999 ; Mean 1971.623 ; StDev 6.349

Variable Format: numeric


Father's birth country


Father's birth country

Value

Label

Frequency

BULGARIEN.

Bulgaria

2

DANMARK.

Denmark

5

FINLAND.

Finland

5

FRANKRIKE.

France

3

GREKLAND.

Greece

4

IRAK.

Iraq

1

ISLAND.

Iceland

1

JUGOSLAVIE.

Yugoslavia

6

LIBANON.

Lebanon

1

LITAUEN.

Lithuania

1

NORGE.

Norway

1

POLEN.

Poland

129

PORTUGAL.

Portugal

1

SLOVENIEN.

Slovenia

1

SOVJETUNIO.

Soviet Union

9

SPANIEN.

Spain

1

SVERIGE.

Sweden

2427

TJECKOSLOV.

Czechoslovakia

4

TURKIET.

Turkey

199

TYSKLAND.

Germany

2

UNGERN.

Hungary

1

ÖSTERRIKE.

Austria

2

Summary Statistics: Valid 2806 ;

Variable Format: character


Mother's birth country


Mother's birth country

Value

Label

Frequency

DANMARK.

Denmark

1

FINLAND.

Finland

9

FRANKRIKE.

France

1

IRAK.

Iraq

1

JUGOSLAVIE.

Yugoslavia

2

LIBANON.

Lebanon

1

NORGE.

Norway

1

PAKISTAN.

Pakistan

1

PALESTINA.

Palestine

1

POLEN.

Poland

254

SOVJETUNIO.

Soviet Union

2

SVERIGE.

Sweden

2387

SYRIEN.

Syria

3

TJECKOSLOV.

Czechoslovakia

3

TURKIET.

Turkey

140

UNGERN.

Hungary

3

Summary Statistics: Valid 2810 ;

Variable Format: character


Marital status 1999


Marital status 1999

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Unmarried

2357

2.

Married

393

4.

Divorced

51

9.

Unknown

19

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-9

Summary Statistics: Valid 2820 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Partner relationship 1999


Partner relationship 1999

Value

Label

Frequency

0.

No partner

716

1.

Live-apart

563

2.

Cohabitant, partner of same sex

11

3.

Cohabitant, partner of opposite sex

1101

4.

Married

385

9.

Unknown

44

Range of Valid Data Values: 0-4

Range of Invalid Data Values: 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 2776 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Number of partner relationships/marriages (1999)


Number of partner relationships/marriages (1999)

Value

Label

Frequency

0.

0

908

1.

1

1439

2.

2

389

3.

3

77

4.

4

6

9.

Unknown

1

Range of Valid Data Values: 0-4

Range of Invalid Data Values: 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 2819 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Length of partner relationship/marriage at the time of survey (1999/05)


Length of partner relationship/marriage at the time of survey (1999/05)

Range of Valid Data Values: -2-201

Summary Statistics: Valid 1456 ; Min. -2 ; Max. 201 ; Mean 53.359 ; StDev 39.027

Variable Format: numeric


Partner's age at the time of survey (Q69)


Partner's age at the time of survey (Q69)

Value

Label

Frequency

0.

0

1

12.

12

1

14.

14

1

16.

16

2

17.

17

3

18.

18

9

19.

19

18

20.

20

53

21.

21

72

22.

22

105

23.

23

133

24.

24

139

25.

25

150

26.

26

183

27.

27

185

28.

28

140

29.

29

123

30.

30

131

31.

31

100

32.

32

112

33.

33

74

34.

34

72

35.

35

39

36.

36

34

37.

37

16

38.

38

21

39.

39

9

40.

40

8

41.

41

8

42.

42

6

43.

43

7

44.

44

2

45.

45

1

46.

46

2

47.

47

3

48.

48

1

50.

50

1

51.

51

2

54.

54

1

55.

55

1

Range of Valid Data Values: 0-55

Summary Statistics: Valid 1969 ; Min. 0 ; Max. 55 ; Mean 27.725 ; StDev 5.045

Variable Format: numeric


Year when R moved together with partner, 1st relationship


Year when R moved together with partner, 1st relationship

Value

Label

Frequency

1981.

1981

1

1982.

1982

1

1983.

1983

3

1984.

1984

7

1985.

1985

16

1986.

1986

39

1987.

1987

71

1988.

1988

78

1989.

1989

119

1990.

1990

144

1991.

1991

187

1992.

1992

155

1993.

1993

151

1994.

1994

163

1995.

1995

168

1996.

1996

203

1997.

1997

169

1998.

1998

175

1999.

1999

36

9999.

Unknown

25

Sysmiss.

909

Range of Valid Data Values: 1981-1999

Range of Invalid Data Values: 9999

Summary Statistics: Valid 1886 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Month when R moved together with partner, 1st relationship


Month when R moved together with partner, 1st relationship

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

January

188

2.

February

85

3.

March

105

4.

April

231

5.

May

128

6.

June

172

7.

July

185

8.

August

191

9.

September

133

10.

October

255

11.

November

82

12.

December

98

99.

NA

58

Sysmiss.

909

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-12

Range of Invalid Data Values: 99

Summary Statistics: Valid 1853 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Year if marriage, 1st relationship


Year if marriage, 1st relationship

Value

Label

Frequency

1987.

1987

2

1988.

1988

5

1989.

1989

16

1990.

1990

20

1991.

1991

25

1992.

1992

32

1993.

1993

26

1994.

1994

36

1995.

1995

51

1996.

1996

53

1997.

1997

47

1998.

1998

54

1999.

1999

5

9999.

9999

1

Sysmiss.

2447

Range of Valid Data Values: 1987-9999

Summary Statistics: Valid 373 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Month if marriage, 1st relationship


Month if marriage, 1st relationship

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

January

17

2.

February

10

3.

March

6

4.

April

14

5.

May

38

6.

June

77

7.

July

83

8.

August

66

9.

September

24

10.

October

15

11.

November

7

12.

December

14

99.

Missing

2

Sysmiss.

2447

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-12

Range of Invalid Data Values: 99

Summary Statistics: Valid 371 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Year when R split with partner, 1st relationship


Year when R split with partner, 1st relationship

Value

Label

Frequency

1982.

1982

1

1984.

1984

1

1987.

1987

13

1988.

1988

14

1989.

1989

32

1990.

1990

39

1991.

1991

55

1992.

1992

64

1993.

1993

47

1994.

1994

78

1995.

1995

83

1996.

1996

103

1997.

1997

127

1998.

1998

87

1999.

1999

28

9999.

9999

24

Sysmiss.

2024

Range of Valid Data Values: 1982-9999

Summary Statistics: Valid 796 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Month when R split with partner, 1st relationship


Month when R split with partner, 1st relationship

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

January

100

2.

February

42

3.

March

36

4.

April

117

5.

May

57

6.

June

39

7.

July

105

8.

August

54

9.

September

43

10.

October

88

11.

November

31

12.

December

41

99.

Missing

43

Sysmiss.

2024

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-12

Range of Invalid Data Values: 99

Summary Statistics: Valid 753 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Year when R moved together with partner, 2nd relationship


Year when R moved together with partner, 2nd relationship

Value

Label

Frequency

1987.

1987

3

1988.

1988

5

1989.

1989

10

1990.

1990

13

1991.

1991

28

1992.

1992

28

1993.

1993

38

1994.

1994

51

1995.

1995

59

1996.

1996

70

1997.

1997

65

1998.

1998

72

1999.

1999

23

9999.

Unknown

7

Sysmiss.

2348

Range of Valid Data Values: 1987-1999

Range of Invalid Data Values: 9999

Summary Statistics: Valid 465 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Month when R moved together with partner, 2nd relationship


Month when R moved together with partner, 2nd relationship

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

January

57

2.

February

40

3.

March

27

4.

April

59

5.

May

21

6.

June

29

7.

July

49

8.

August

39

9.

September

37

10.

October

51

11.

November

21

12.

December

25

99.

Missing

17

Sysmiss.

2348

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-12

Range of Invalid Data Values: 99

Summary Statistics: Valid 455 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Year if marriage, 2nd relationship


Year if marriage, 2nd relationship

Value

Label

Frequency

1989.

1989

2

1991.

1991

1

1992.

1992

3

1993.

1993

7

1994.

1994

4

1995.

1995

5

1996.

1996

9

1997.

1997

12

1998.

1998

11

1999.

1999

2

Sysmiss.

2764

Range of Valid Data Values: 1989-1999

Summary Statistics: Valid 56 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Month if marriage, 2nd relationship


Month if marriage, 2nd relationship

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

January

1

2.

February

3

3.

March

3

4.

April

5

5.

May

7

6.

June

12

7.

July

7

8.

August

11

9.

September

2

10.

October

0

11.

November

1

12.

December

4

Sysmiss.

2764

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-12

Summary Statistics: Valid 56 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Year when R split with partner, 2nd relationship


Year when R split with partner, 2nd relationship

Value

Label

Frequency

1990.

1990

4

1991.

1991

1

1992.

1992

8

1993.

1993

9

1994.

1994

14

1995.

1995

18

1996.

1996

29

1997.

1997

28

1998.

1998

38

1999.

1999

8

9999.

9999

6

Sysmiss.

2657

Range of Valid Data Values: 1990-1999

Range of Invalid Data Values: 9999

Summary Statistics: Valid 157 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Month when R split with partner, 2nd relationship


Month when R split with partner, 2nd relationship

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

January

19

2.

February

14

3.

March

9

4.

April

28

5.

May

1

6.

June

13

7.

July

11

8.

August

14

9.

September

8

10.

October

22

11.

November

7

12.

December

8

99.

Missing

9

Sysmiss.

2657

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-12

Range of Invalid Data Values: 99

Summary Statistics: Valid 154 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Year when R moved together with partner, 3rd relationship


Year when R moved together with partner, 3rd relationship

Value

Label

Frequency

1990.

1990

1

1991.

1991

1

1992.

1992

4

1993.

1993

4

1994.

1994

5

1995.

1995

12

1996.

1996

13

1997.

1997

15

1998.

1998

21

1999.

1999

6

9999.

Unknown

1

Sysmiss.

2737

Range of Valid Data Values: 1990-1999

Range of Invalid Data Values: 9999

Summary Statistics: Valid 82 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Month when R moved together with partner, 3rd relationship

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

January

6

2.

February

6

3.

March

6

4.

April

14

5.

May

6

6.

June

5

7.

July

10

8.

August

2

9.

September

2

10.

October

8

11.

November

3

12.

December

11

99.

Missing

4

Sysmiss.

2737

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-12

Range of Invalid Data Values: 99

Summary Statistics: Valid 79 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Year if marriage, 3rd relationship


Year if marriage, 3rd relationship

Value

Label

Frequency

1995.

1995

1

1996.

1996

1

1997.

1997

3

1998.

1998

3

Sysmiss.

2812

Range of Valid Data Values: 1995-1998

Summary Statistics: Valid 8 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Month if marriage, 3rd relationship


Month if marriage, 3rd relationship

Value

Label

Frequency

3.

March

1

6.

June

2

7.

July

2

9.

September

1

10.

October

1

11.

November

1

Sysmiss.

2812

Range of Valid Data Values: 3-11

Summary Statistics: Valid 8 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Year when R split with partner, 3rd relationship


Year when R split with partner, 3rd relationship

Value

Label

Frequency

1992.

1992

2

1994.

1994

1

1995.

1995

1

1996.

1996

4

1997.

1997

2

1998.

1998

10

1999.

1999

2

9999.

9999

2

Sysmiss.

2796

Range of Valid Data Values: 1992-9999

Summary Statistics: Valid 24 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Month when R split with partner, 3rd relationship


Month when R split with partner, 3rd relationship

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

January

3

2.

February

1

3.

March

3

6.

June

1

7.

July

3

8.

August

2

9.

September

1

10.

October

3

11.

November

1

12.

December

1

99.

Missing

5

Sysmiss.

2796

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-12

Range of Invalid Data Values: 99

Summary Statistics: Valid 19 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Year when R moved together with partner, 4th relationship


Year when R moved together with partner, 4th relationship

Value

Label

Frequency

1994.

1994

2

1995.

1995

2

1996.

1996

1

1997.

1997

1

Sysmiss.

2814

Range of Valid Data Values: 1994-1997

Summary Statistics: Valid 6 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Month when R moved together with partner, 4th relationship

Value

Label

Frequency

8.

August

1

9.

September

1

10.

October

2

12.

December

2

Sysmiss.

2814

Range of Valid Data Values: 8-12

Summary Statistics: Valid 6 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Year if marriage, 4th relationship


Year if marriage, 4th relationship

Value

Label

Frequency

1995.

1995

1

1998.

1998

1

Sysmiss.

2818

Range of Valid Data Values: 1995-1998

Summary Statistics: Valid 2 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Month if marriage, 4th relationship


Month if marriage, 4th relationship

Value

Label

Frequency

5.

May

1

6.

June

1

Sysmiss.

2818

Range of Valid Data Values: 5-6

Summary Statistics: Valid 2 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Year when R split with partner, 4th relationship


Year when R split with partner, 4th relationship

Value

Label

Frequency

Sysmiss.

2820

Summary Statistics: Valid 0 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Month when R split with partner, 4th relationship


Month when R split with partner, 4th relationship

Value

Label

Frequency

Sysmiss.

2820

Summary Statistics: Valid 0 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Contradicting information about relationships


Contradicting information about relationships

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Information given in 2003 contradicts information given in 1999

111

Sysmiss.

2709

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-1

Summary Statistics: Valid 111 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Number of reported births (1999)


Number of reported births (1999)

Value

Label

Frequency

0.

0

2110

1.

1

358

2.

2

296

3.

3

49

4.

4

7

Range of Valid Data Values: 0-4

Summary Statistics: Valid 2820 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Birth year, 1st child


Birth year, 1st child

Value

Label

Frequency

1979.

1979

1

1981.

1981

1

1985.

1985

1

1986.

1986

3

1987.

1987

8

1988.

1988

12

1989.

1989

22

1990.

1990

42

1991.

1991

43

1992.

1992

46

1993.

1993

66

1994.

1994

78

1995.

1995

75

1996.

1996

97

1997.

1997

97

1998.

1998

87

1999.

1999

30

0.

Unknown

1

Sysmiss.

2110

Range of Valid Data Values: 1979-1999

Range of Invalid Data Values: 0

Summary Statistics: Valid 709 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Birth month, 1st child


Birth month, 1st child

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

January

60

2.

February

71

3.

March

55

4.

April

73

5.

May

54

6.

June

66

7.

July

56

8.

August

48

9.

September

60

10.

October

61

11.

November

56

12.

December

49

0.

Unknown

1

Sysmiss.

2110

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-12

Range of Invalid Data Values: 0

Summary Statistics: Valid 709 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Gender, 1st child


Gender, 1st child

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Boy

392

2.

Girl

311

0.

Unknown

7

Sysmiss.

2110

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-2

Range of Invalid Data Values: 0

Summary Statistics: Valid 703 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Twin, 1st child


Twin, 1st child

Value

Label

Frequency

0.

No

702

1.

Yes

8

Sysmiss.

2110

Range of Valid Data Values: 0-1

Summary Statistics: Valid 710 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Housing, 1st child


Housing, 1st child

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

In the household

659

2.

With the other parent

20

3.

Alternately living

20

0.

Unknown

11

Sysmiss.

2110

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-3

Range of Invalid Data Values: 0

Summary Statistics: Valid 699 ;

Variable Format: numeric


R's marital status at the birth of 1st child


R's marital status at the birth of 1st child

Value

Label

Frequency

0.

Unknown

680

1.

Unmarried

22

2.

Married

7

3.

Divorced

1

Sysmiss.

2110

Range of Valid Data Values: 0-3

Summary Statistics: Valid 710 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Birth year, 2nd child

Value

Label

Frequency

1980.

1980

1

1989.

1989

5

1990.

1990

4

1991.

1991

15

1992.

1992

19

1993.

1993

31

1994.

1994

34

1995.

1995

39

1996.

1996

47

1997.

1997

45

1998.

1998

93

1999.

1999

19

Sysmiss.

2468

Range of Valid Data Values: 1980-1999

Summary Statistics: Valid 352 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Birth month, 2nd child

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

January

29

2.

February

32

3.

March

40

4.

April

33

5.

May

24

6.

June

23

7.

July

43

8.

August

35

9.

September

17

10.

October

22

11.

November

24

12.

December

30

Sysmiss.

2468

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-12

Summary Statistics: Valid 352 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Gender, 2nd child

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Boy

184

2.

Girl

164

0.

Unknown

4

Sysmiss.

2468

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-2

Range of Invalid Data Values: 0

Summary Statistics: Valid 348 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Twin, 2nd child

Value

Label

Frequency

0.

No

343

1.

Yes

9

Sysmiss.

2468

Range of Valid Data Values: 0-1

Summary Statistics: Valid 352 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Housing, 2nd child

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

In the household

339

2.

With the other parent

4

3.

Alternately living

8

0.

Unknown

1

Sysmiss.

2468

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-3

Range of Invalid Data Values: 0

Summary Statistics: Valid 351 ;

Variable Format: numeric


R's marital status at the birth of 2nd child


R's marital status at the birth of 2nd child

Value

Label

Frequency

0.

Unknown

333

1.

Unmarried

10

2.

Married

9

Sysmiss.

2468

Range of Valid Data Values: 0-2

Summary Statistics: Valid 352 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Birth year, 3rd child


Birth year, 3rd child

Value

Label

Frequency

1990.

1990

1

1992.

1992

1

1993.

1993

4

1994.

1994

10

1995.

1995

7

1996.

1996

9

1997.

1997

8

1998.

1998

12

1999.

1999

4

Sysmiss.

2764

Range of Valid Data Values: 1990-1999

Summary Statistics: Valid 56 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Birth month, 3rd child


Birth month, 3rd child

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

January

5

2.

February

2

3.

March

7

4.

April

6

5.

May

2

6.

June

3

7.

July

6

8.

August

5

9.

September

8

10.

October

5

11.

November

2

12.

December

5

Sysmiss.

2764

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-12

Summary Statistics: Valid 56 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Gender, 3rd child


Gender, 3rd child

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Boy

25

2.

Girl

31

Sysmiss.

2764

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-2

Summary Statistics: Valid 56 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Twin, 3rd child


Twin, 3rd child

Value

Label

Frequency

0.

No

55

1.

Yes

1

Sysmiss.

2764

Range of Valid Data Values: 0-1

Summary Statistics: Valid 56 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Housing, 3rd child


Housing, 3rd child

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

In the household

55

0.

Unknown

1

Sysmiss.

2764

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-1

Range of Invalid Data Values: 0

Summary Statistics: Valid 55 ;

Variable Format: numeric


R's marital status at the birth of 3rd child


R's marital status at the birth of 3rd child

Value

Label

Frequency

0.

Unknown

53

1.

Unmarried

1

2.

Married

2

Sysmiss.

2764

Range of Valid Data Values: 0-2

Summary Statistics: Valid 56 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Birth year, 4th child


Birth year, 4th child

Value

Label

Frequency

1994.

1994

1

1996.

1996

1

1997.

1997

3

1998.

1998

2

Sysmiss.

2813

Range of Valid Data Values: 1994-1998

Summary Statistics: Valid 7 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Birth month, 4th child


Birth month, 4th child

Value

Label

Frequency

3.

March

1

4.

April

2

8.

August

1

9.

September

1

11.

November

2

Sysmiss.

2813

Range of Valid Data Values: 3-11

Summary Statistics: Valid 7 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Gender, 4th child


Gender, 4th child

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Boy

4

2.

Girl

3

Sysmiss.

2813

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-2

Summary Statistics: Valid 7 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Twin, 4th child


Twin, 4th child

Value

Label

Frequency

0.

No

7

Sysmiss.

2813

Range of Valid Data Values: 0-1

Summary Statistics: Valid 7 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Housing, 4th child


Housing, 4th child

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

In the household

6

0.

Unknown

1

Sysmiss.

2813

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-1

Range of Invalid Data Values: 0

Summary Statistics: Valid 6 ;

Variable Format: numeric


R's marital status at the birth of 4th child


R's marital status at the birth of 4th child

Value

Label

Frequency

0.

Unknown

7

Sysmiss.

2813

Range of Valid Data Values: 0-0

Summary Statistics: Valid 7 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q1a. Year of birth


When were you born? - Year

Value

Label

Frequency

68.

1968

738

72.

1972

968

74.

1974

1

76.

1976

1104

Sysmiss.

9

Range of Valid Data Values: 68-76

Summary Statistics: Valid 2811 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q1b. Month


When were you born? - Month

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

January

251

2.

February

218

3.

March

243

4.

April

260

5.

May

264

6.

June

228

7.

July

265

8.

August

230

9.

September

209

10.

October

230

11.

November

217

12.

December

199

Sysmiss.

6

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-12

Summary Statistics: Valid 2814 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q1c. Male or female


Are you male or female?

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Male

1301

2.

Female

1490

9.

Missing

29

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-2

Range of Invalid Data Values: 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 2791 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q2_1. Adult - left parental home


You can vote when you are 18 and buy liquor when you are 20. What do you think is most important for being regarded as an adult? - To have left one's parental home

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

1 - Unimportant

490

2.

2

447

3.

3

627

4.

4

705

5.

5 - Very important

475

6.

Don't know

31

9.

Missing

45

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-6

Range of Invalid Data Values: 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 2775 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q2_2. Adult - cohabiting or married


You can vote when you are 18 and buy liquor when you are 20. What do you think is most important for being regarded as an adult? - To be cohabiting or married

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

1 - Unimportant

1342

2.

2

488

3.

3

400

4.

4

313

5.

5 - Very important

184

6.

Don't know

37

9.

Missing

56

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-6

Range of Invalid Data Values: 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 2764 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q2_3. Adult - have children


You can vote when you are 18 and buy liquor when you are 20. What do you think is most important for being regarded as an adult? - To have children

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

1 - Unimportant

1288

2.

2

434

3.

3

405

4.

4

320

5.

5 - Very important

271

6.

Don't know

46

9.

Missing

56

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-56

Range of Invalid Data Values: 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 2764 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q2_4. Adult - able to support oneself


You can vote when you are 18 and buy liquor when you are 20. What do you think is most important for being regarded as an adult? - To be able to support oneself

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

1 - Unimportant

75

2.

2

90

3.

3

266

4.

4

649

5.

5 - Very important

1688

6.

Don't know

19

9.

Missing

33

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-6

Range of Invalid Data Values: 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 2787 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q2_5. The most important


For you, which one is the most important?

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

To have left one's parental home

311

2.

To be cohabiting or married

63

3.

To have children

130

4.

To be able to support oneself

2108

9.

Missing

208

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-4

Range of Invalid Data Values: 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 2612 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q3_1. Parents stay together for the sake of children


What is your view on the following statements? - Parents should stay together for the sake of the children

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

1 - Don't agree at all

739

2.

2

636

3.

3

716

4.

4

360

5.

5 - Agree completely

287

6.

Don't know

64

9.

Missing

18

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-6

Range of Invalid Data Values: 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 2802 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q3_2. Children - part of what gives life meaning


What is your view on the following statements? - To have children is part of what gives life meaning

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

1 - Don't agree at all

151

2.

2

216

3.

3

449

4.

4

696

5.

5 - Agree completely

1229

6.

Don't know

67

9.

Missing

12

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-6

Range of Invalid Data Values: 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 2808 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q3_3. Something missing if no children


What is your view on the following statements? - Something is missing if a couple never has children

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

1 - Don't agree at all

1047

2.

2

481

3.

3

465

4.

4

375

5.

5 - Agree completely

288

6.

Don't know

153

9.

Missing

11

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-6

Range of Invalid Data Values: 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 2809 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q3_4. Too easy to get divorced


What is your view on the following statements? - It is too easy to get divorced in today's Sweden

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

1 - Don't agree at all

693

2.

2

355

3.

3

539

4.

4

414

5.

5 - Agree completely

486

6.

Don't know

321

9.

Missing

12

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-6

Range of Invalid Data Values: 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 2808 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q3_5. Men and women equal - good society


What is your view on the following statements? - A society where men and women are equal is a good society

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

1 - Don't agree at all

34

2.

2

46

3.

3

219

4.

4

481

5.

5 - Agree completely

1928

6.

Don't know

59

9.

Missing

53

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-6

Range of Invalid Data Values: 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 2767 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q3_6. Men as good in caring jobs


What is your view on the following statements? - Men can do as well as women in caring jobs

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

1 - Don't agree at all

15

2.

2

51

3.

3

123

4.

4

341

5.

5 - Agree completely

2211

6.

Don't know

30

9.

Missing

49

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-6

Range of Invalid Data Values: 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 2771 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q3_7. Women as good in technical jobs


What is your view on the following statements? - Women can do as well as men in technical jobs

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

1 - Don't agree at all

33

2.

2

57

3.

3

135

4.

4

364

5.

5 - Agree completely

2152

6.

Don't know

26

9.

Missing

53

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-6

Range of Invalid Data Values: 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 2767 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q3_8. It is as important for a woman to support herself


What is your view on the following statements? - It is as important for a woman as for a man to support herself

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

1 - Don't agree at all

16

2.

2

21

3.

3

57

4.

4

207

5.

5 - Agree completely

2435

6.

Don't know

37

9.

Missing

47

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-6

Range of Invalid Data Values: 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 2773 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q3_9. A woman should have legal rights to have abortion


What is your view on the following statements? - A pregnant woman should have the legal right to decide for herself whether or not to have an abortion

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

1 - Don't agree at all

108

2.

2

81

3.

3

231

4.

4

292

5.

5 - Agree completely

1957

6.

Don't know

102

9.

Missing

49

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-6

Range of Invalid Data Values: 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 2771 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q4. Living together without being married


In today's Sweden it is common to live together without being married. What is your opinion about that?

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

It is never OK

191

2.

It is OK, but only for a short time before getting married

85

3.

It is OK as long as you don't have children

159

4.

It is OK even if you have children

2340

9.

Missing

45

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-4

Range of Invalid Data Values: 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 2775 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q5_1. Important - time for sport, hobbies


People have different opinions about what is important in life. Can you tell us how important it is to you to achieve the following? - To have a lot of time for sports, hobbies and other leisure time activities

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

1 - Unimportant

52

2.

2

166

3.

3

649

4.

4

851

5.

5 - Very important

1065

6.

Don't know

9

9.

Missing

28

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-6

Range of Invalid Data Values: 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 2792 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q5_2. Important - good economy


People have different opinions about what is important in life. Can you tell us how important it is to you to achieve the following? - To do well economically

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

1 - Unimportant

7

2.

2

32

3.

3

229

4.

4

829

5.

5 - Very important

1698

6.

Don't know

1

9.

Missing

24

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-6

Range of Invalid Data Values: 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 2796 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q5_3. Important - good cohabiting/married relationship


People have different opinions about what is important in life. Can you tell us how important it is to you to achieve the following? - To live in a good cohabiting or married relationship

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

1 - Unimportant

45

2.

2

60

3.

3

240

4.

4

495

5.

5 - Very important

1939

6.

Don't know

14

9.

Missing

27

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-6

Range of Invalid Data Values: 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 2793 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q5_4. Important - to have children


People have different opinions about what is important in life. Can you tell us how important it is to you to achieve the following? - To have children

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

1 - Unimportant

128

2.

2

206

3.

3

511

4.

4

756

5.

5 - Very important

1158

6.

Don't know

35

9.

Missing

26

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-6

Range of Invalid Data Values: 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 2794 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q5_5. Important - successful at work


People have different opinions about what is important in life. Can you tell us how important it is to you to achieve the following? - To be successful in my work

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

1 - Unimportant

53

2.

2

90

3.

3

630

4.

4

1075

5.

5 - Very important

934

6.

Don't know

15

9.

Missing

23

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-6

Range of Invalid Data Values: 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 2797 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q6_1. Satisfied with current occupation


Are you satisfied or dissatisfied with your current occupation?

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

1 - Very dissatisfied

144

2.

2

203

3.

3

596

4.

4

966

5.

5 - Very satisfied

842

6.

Don't know/does not apply

43

9.

Missing

26

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-6

Range of Invalid Data Values: 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 2794 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q6_2. Satisfied with relationship with mother


Are you satisfied or dissatisfied with your relationship with your mother?

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

1 - Very dissatisfied

82

2.

2

110

3.

3

309

4.

4

650

5.

5 - Very satisfied

1575

6.

Don't know/does not apply

71

9.

Missing

23

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-6

Range of Invalid Data Values: 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 2797 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q6_3. Satisfied with relationship with father


Are you satisfied or dissatisfied with your relationship with your father?

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

1 - Very dissatisfied

175

2.

2

159

3.

3

401

4.

4

606

5.

5 - Very satisfied

1288

6.

Don't know/does not apply

174

9.

Missing

17

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-6

Range of Invalid Data Values: 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 2803 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q6_4. Satisfied with relationship with partner


Are you satisfied or dissatisfied with your relationship with your partner?

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

1 - Very dissatisfied

45

2.

2

48

3.

3

175

4.

4

431

5.

5 - Very satisfied

1376

6.

Don't know/does not apply

702

9.

Missing

43

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-6

Range of Invalid Data Values: 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 2777 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q6_5. Satisfied with economic situatuion


Are you satisfied or dissatisfied with your economic situation?

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

1 - Very dissatisfied

336

2.

2

468

3.

3

977

4.

4

738

5.

5 - Very satisfied

270

6.

Don't know/does not apply

14

9.

Missing

17

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-6

Range of Invalid Data Values: 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 2803 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q6_6. Satisfied with housing situation


Are you satisfied or dissatisfied with your housing situation?

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

1 - Very dissatisfied

125

2.

2

270

3.

3

699

4.

4

888

5.

5 - Very satisfied

794

6.

Don't know/does not apply

22

9.

Missing

22

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-6

Range of Invalid Data Values: 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 2798 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q6_7. Satisfied with education


Are you satisfied or dissatisfied with your education?

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

1 - Very dissatisfied

169

2.

2

385

3.

3

822

4.

4

751

5.

5 - Very satisfied

617

6.

Don't know/does not apply

53

9.

Missing

23

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-6

Range of Invalid Data Values: 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 2797 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q6_8. Satisfied with living location


Are you satisfied or dissatisfied with the location where you're living?

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

1 - Very dissatisfied

72

2.

2

206

3.

3

577

4.

4

871

5.

5 - Very satisfied

1067

6.

Don't know/does not apply

8

9.

Missing

19

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-6

Range of Invalid Data Values: 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 2801 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q6_9. Satisfied with life in general


Are you satisfied or dissatisfied with life in general right now?

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

1 - Very dissatisfied

52

2.

2

147

3.

3

571

4.

4

1239

5.

5 - Very satisfied

776

6.

Don't know/does not apply

9

9.

Missing

26

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-6

Range of Invalid Data Values: 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 2794 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q6_10. Satisfied with Swedish society


Are you satisfied or dissatisfied with Swedish society today?

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

1 - Very dissatisfied

340

2.

2

761

3.

3

1220

4.

4

386

5.

5 - Very satisfied

34

6.

Don't know/does not apply

59

9.

Missing

20

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-6

Range of Invalid Data Values: 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 2800 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q7. Member of state church or other religious congregation


Are you member of the Swedish state church or some other religious congregation?

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Yes

2051

2.

No

741

9.

Missing

28

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-2

Range of Invalid Data Values: 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 2792 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q8_1. Member of Swedish state church


Which one? - Swedish state church

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Marked

1801

Sysmiss.

1019

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-1

Summary Statistics: Valid 1801 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q8_2. Member of free church


Which one? - "Free churches"

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Marked

76

Sysmiss.

2744

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-1

Summary Statistics: Valid 76 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q8_3. Member of Catholic church


Which one? - Catholic church

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Marked

67

Sysmiss.

2753

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-1

Summary Statistics: Valid 67 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q8_4. Member of Orthodox church


Which one? - Orthodox church

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Marked

42

Sysmiss.

2778

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-1

Summary Statistics: Valid 42 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q8_5. Member of Jewish congregation


Which one? - Jewish congregation

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Marked

15

Sysmiss.

2805

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-1

Summary Statistics: Valid 15 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q8_6. Member of Muslim congregation


Which one? - Muslim congregation

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Marked

35

Sysmiss.

2785

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-1

Summary Statistics: Valid 35 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q8_7. Member of other religious congregation


Which one? - Other religious congregation

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Marked

13

Sysmiss.

2807

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-1

Summary Statistics: Valid 13 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q9. Importance of religion


How important is religion in your life?

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Very important

174

2.

Rather important

307

3.

Of little or no importance

2283

9.

Missing

56

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-3

Range of Invalid Data Values: 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 2764 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q10. Home when growing up


Where did you live when you grew up (up to age 16)?

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Stockholm/Gothenburg/Malmö: inner city

143

2.

Stockholm/Gothenburg/Malmö: suburb

644

3.

Small/medium size town or city

1513

4.

Rural area (Sweden)

470

5.

Abroad: big city

16

6.

Abroad: small or medium size town or city

6

7.

Abroad: rural area

0

9.

Missing

28

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-7

Range of Invalid Data Values: 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 2792 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q11. Family's economic situation growing up


How was your family's economic situation when you grew up?

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Mostly very good

560

2.

Mostly rather good

1707

3.

Mostly rather bad

393

4.

Don't know

101

9.

Missing

59

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-4

Range of Invalid Data Values: 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 2761 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q12. Parents married


Are your parents married to each other?

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Yes

1799

2.

Not any more

729

3.

They never married

233

4.

Don't know

7

9.

Missing

52

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-4

Range of Invalid Data Values: 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 2768 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q13. Parents lived together during upbringing


Did your parents live together continuously up to your 16th birthday?

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Yes

2070

2.

No

742

9.

Missing

8

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-2

Range of Invalid Data Values: 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 2812 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q14. Why not?


Why not?

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

My parents divorced/moved apart

601

2.

Mother and/or father died

60

3.

They never lived together

44

4.

Other

26

9.

Missing/does not apply

2089

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-9

Summary Statistics: Valid 2820 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q15. R:s age when parents got divorced/moved apart


How old were you when your parents got divorced/moved apart (or died)?

Range of Valid Data Values: 0-29

Summary Statistics: Valid 714 ; Min. 0 ; Max. 29 ; Mean 8.186 ; StDev 5.245

Variable Format: numeric


Q16. R then lived with


With whom did you live after that?

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Mainly with mother

429

2.

Mainly with father

74

3.

Mainly with mother and stepfather

159

4.

Mainly with father and stepmother

23

5.

Equally with my mother and father

37

6.

With neither of my parents

34

9.

Missing/does not apply

2064

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-6

Range of Invalid Data Values: 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 756 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q17a. Siblings


Do you have any siblings? If so, how many?

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

No

171

2.

Yes

2559

9.

Missing

90

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-2

Range of Invalid Data Values: 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 2730 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q17b_1. Number of full siblings


Number of full siblings

Value

Label

Frequency

0.

0

367

1.

1

1244

2.

2

709

3.

3

222

4.

4

91

5.

5

24

6.

6

19

7.

7

11

8.

8

3

9.

9

1

11.

11

1

Sysmiss.

128

Range of Valid Data Values: 0-11

Summary Statistics: Valid 2692 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q17b_2. Number of half siblings


Number of half siblings

Value

Label

Frequency

0.

0

1861

1.

1

257

2.

2

162

3.

3

69

4.

4

52

5.

5

13

6.

6

12

7.

7

8

8.

8

2

9.

9

2

11.

11

1

19.

19

1

Sysmiss.

380

Range of Valid Data Values: 0-19

Summary Statistics: Valid 2440 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q17b_3. Number of "step"- or fostersiblings


Number of "step"- or fostersiblings

Value

Label

Frequency

0.

0

2112

1.

1

81

2.

2

80

3.

3

38

4.

4

11

5.

5

5

6.

6

1

7.

7

2

9.

9

1

Sysmiss.

489

Range of Valid Data Values: 0-9

Summary Statistics: Valid 2331 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q18a. R has moved away from parental home


How old were you when you moved away from your parental home (for the first time) to live by yourself or with friends or a partner? - Have moved

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Yes

2263

2.

No

220

9.

Missing

337

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-2

Range of Invalid Data Values: 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 2483 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q18b. Age when R moved away from parental home


How old were you when you moved away from your parental home (for the first time) to live by yourself or with friends or a partner? - When I was ... years old

Value

Label

Frequency

10.

10

1

12.

12

1

14.

14

7

15.

15

41

16.

16

205

17.

17

177

18.

18

497

19.

19

571

20.

20

488

21.

21

284

22.

22

171

23.

23

73

24.

24

30

25.

25

25

26.

26

12

27.

27

5

Sysmiss.

232

Range of Valid Data Values: 10-27

Summary Statistics: Valid 2588 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q19a_1. Mother as parent


If you think back to your childhood and adolescence, how would you rate your mother and father as parents? - Mother

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

1 - Bad

40

2.

2

76

3.

3

246

4.

4

818

5.

5 - Very good

1572

6.

Does not apply

15

9.

Missing

53

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-5

Range of Invalid Data Values: 6, 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 2752 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q19a_2. Father as parent


If you think back to your childhood and adolescence, how would you rate your mother and father as parents? - Father

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

1 - Bad

158

2.

2

176

3.

3

371

4.

4

771

5.

5 - Very good

1208

6.

Does not apply

58

9.

Missing

78

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-5

Range of Invalid Data Values: 6, 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 2684 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q19b_1. Stepmother as parent


If you lived with a stepfather or stepmother, do the same evaluation for them? - Stepmother

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

1 - Bad

40

2.

2

28

3.

3

36

4.

4

24

5.

5 - Very good

21

9.

Missing/does not apply

2671

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-5

Range of Invalid Data Values: 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 149 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q19b_2. Stepfather as parent


If you lived with a stepfather or stepmother, do the same evaluation for them? - Stepfather

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

1 - Bad

53

2.

2

38

3.

3

76

4.

4

85

5.

5 - Very good

80

9.

Missing/does not apply

2488

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-5

Range of Invalid Data Values: 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 332 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q20. Fights when R grew up


Where there fights or serious discord in your family when you grew up?

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Yes

835

2.

Perhaps

364

3.

No

1559

9.

Missing

62

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-3

Range of Invalid Data Values: 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 2758 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q21_1. Fight between biologocal parents


Between whom were there fights? - Between my biological parents

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Marked

853

Sysmiss.

1967

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-1

Summary Statistics: Valid 853 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q21_2. Fight between one biological- and one stepparent


Between whom were there fights? - Between one biological parent and one stepparent

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Marked

120

Sysmiss.

2700

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-1

Summary Statistics: Valid 120 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q21_3. Fight between R and one/both parents


Between whom were there fights? - Between me and one or both biological parent

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Marked

354

Sysmiss.

2466

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-1

Summary Statistics: Valid 354 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q21_4. Fight between R and stepmother/stepfather


Between whom were there fights? - Between me and stepmother or stepfather

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Marked

116

Sysmiss.

2704

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-1

Summary Statistics: Valid 116 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q21_5. Fight between siblings/other


Between whom were there fights? - Between siblings or other

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Marked

276

Sysmiss.

2544

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-1

Summary Statistics: Valid 276 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q22a. Father's occupation while R was growing up (SEI)


What was your father's (or stepfather's) main occupation or economic activity while you were growing up? - Occupation

Value

Label

Frequency

11.

Unskilled employees in goods production

168

12.

Unskilled employees in service production

200

21.

Skilled employees in goods production

215

22.

Skilled employees in service production

26

33.

Assistant non-manual employees, lower level I

32

36.

Assistant non-manual employees, lower level II

110

46.

Intermediate non-manual employees

242

56.

Professionals and other higher non-manual employees

163

57.

Upper-level executives

24

60.

Self-employed professionals

13

79.

Entrepeneurs

206

89.

Farmers

33

93.

93

2

94.

94

2

95.

95

2

97.

97

5

99.

99

42

Sysmiss.

1335

Range of Valid Data Values: 11-99

Summary Statistics: Valid 1485 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q22b. Was he...


What was your father's (or stepfather's) main occupation or economic activity while you were growing up? - Was he...

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Employee

2177

2.

Self-employed with employees

236

3.

Self employed without employees

195

4.

Farmer

77

9.

Missing

135

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-4

Range of Invalid Data Values: 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 2685 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q23a. Mother worked before R started school


Did your mother work outside the home when you were growing up? - Before you started school

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Full-time

803

2.

Part-time

672

3.

Yes, but don't know how much

475

4.

No, not at all

710

5.

Don't remember

103

9.

Missing

57

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-5

Range of Invalid Data Values: 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 2763 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q23b. Mother worked while R were in school


Did your mother work outside the home when you were growing up? - While you were in school

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Full-time

1257

2.

Part-time

793

3.

Yes, but don't know how much

348

4.

No, not at all

297

5.

Don't remember

35

9.

Missing

90

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-5

Range of Invalid Data Values: 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 2730 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q24a. Mother's education


What is your mother's and father's level of education? - Mother

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

<= nine years

705

2.

Upper secondary <= 2 years

436

3.

Flickskola

265

4.

Upper secondary 3-4 years

138

5.

Post-gymnasium

397

6.

Post gymnasium without degree

130

7.

Post gymnasium with degree

376

8.

Don't know/does not apply

284

9.

Missing

89

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-7

Range of Invalid Data Values: 8, 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 2447 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q24b. Father's education


What is your mother's and father's level of education? - Father

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

<= nine years

889

2.

Upper secondary <= 2 years

476

3.

Realskola

105

4.

Upper secondary 3-4 years

168

5.

Post-gymnasium

91

6.

Post gymnasium without degree

120

7.

Post gymnasium with degree

488

8.

Don't know/does not apply

369

9.

Missing

114

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-7

Range of Invalid Data Values: 8, 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 2337 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q24txt. Comment


Comment

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

186

Sysmiss.

2634

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-1

Summary Statistics: Valid 186 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q25_1. Contact with mother


How often are you in contact with your parents and grandparents today? - Contact with mother

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Very often

1751

2.

Rather often

832

3.

Rarely

93

4.

Sporadically or never

43

5.

Dead/does not apply

86

9.

Missing

15

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-4

Range of Invalid Data Values: 5, 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 2719 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q25_2. Contact with father


How often are you in contact with your parents and grandparents today? - Contact with father

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Very often

1290

2.

Rather often

921

3.

Rarely

239

4.

Sporadically or never

127

5.

Dead/does not apply

228

9.

Missing

15

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-4

Range of Invalid Data Values: 5, 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 2577 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q25_3. Contact with stepmother


How often are you in contact with your parents and grandparents today? - Contact with stepmother

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Very often

32

2.

Rather often

76

3.

Rarely

78

4.

Sporadically or never

76

5.

Dead/does not apply

1311

9.

Missing

1247

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-4

Range of Invalid Data Values: 5, 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 262 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q25_4. Contact with stepfather


How often are you in contact with your parents and grandparents today? - Contact with stepfather

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Very often

115

2.

Rather often

128

3.

Rarely

63

4.

Sporadically or never

53

5.

Dead/does not apply

1273

9.

Missing

1188

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-4

Range of Invalid Data Values: 5, 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 359 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q25_5. Contact with maternal grandmother


How often are you in contact with your parents and grandparents today? - Contact with maternal grandmother

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Very often

168

2.

Rather often

511

3.

Rarely

585

4.

Sporadically or never

156

5.

Dead/does not apply

1320

9.

Missing

80

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-4

Range of Invalid Data Values: 5, 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 1420 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q25_6. Contact with maternal grandfather


How often are you in contact with your parents and grandparents today? - Contact with maternal grandfather

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Very often

69

2.

Rather often

244

3.

Rarely

306

4.

Sporadically or never

137

5.

Dead/does not apply

1974

9.

Missing

90

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-4

Range of Invalid Data Values: 5, 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 756 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q25_7. Contact with paternal grandmother


How often are you in contact with your parents and grandparents today? - Contact with paternal grandmother

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Very often

71

2.

Rather often

352

3.

Rarely

512

4.

Sporadically or never

237

5.

Dead/does not apply

1568

9.

Missing

80

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-4

Range of Invalid Data Values: 5, 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 1172 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q25_8. Contact with paternal grandfather


How often are you in contact with your parents and grandparents today? - Contact with paternal grandfather

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Very often

37

2.

Rather often

172

3.

Rarely

251

4.

Sporadically or never

118

5.

Dead/does not apply

2149

9.

Missing

93

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-4

Range of Invalid Data Values: 5, 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 578 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q26. Economic help from relative


During the last year, have you received economic assistance from your parents or other close relatives?

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Yes, some/occasionally

1266

2.

Yes, a lot/often

455

3.

No

1084

9.

Missing

15

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-3

Range of Invalid Data Values: 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 2805 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q27_1. R would talk to mother about personal problems


How likely are you to talk with your parents about any personal problems that you have? - Talk to mother

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Very likely

1455

2.

Somewhat likely

927

3.

Unlikely

266

4.

Does not apply

143

9.

Missing

29

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-3

Range of Invalid Data Values: 4, 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 2648 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q27_2. R would talk to father about personal problems


How likely are you to talk with your parents about any personal problems that you have? - Talk to father

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Very likely

801

2.

Somewhat likely

1098

3.

Unlikely

547

4.

Does not apply

319

9.

Missing

55

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-3

Range of Invalid Data Values: 4, 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 2446 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q27_3. R would talk to stepmother about personal problems


How likely are you to talk with your parents about any personal problems that you have? - Talk to stepmother

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Very likely

25

2.

Somewhat likely

67

3.

Unlikely

111

4.

Does not apply

1300

9.

Missing

1317

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-3

Range of Invalid Data Values: 4, 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 203 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q27_4. R would talk to stepfather about personal problems


How likely are you to talk with your parents about any personal problems that you have? - Talk to stepfather

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Very likely

54

2.

Somewhat likely

121

3.

Unlikely

116

4.

Does not apply

1233

9.

Missing

1296

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-3

Range of Invalid Data Values: 4, 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 291 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q28. Parent member of religious congregation


Is any of your parents a member of the Swedish state church or some other religious congregation?

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Yes

1995

2.

No

600

3.

Don't know

201

9.

Missing

24

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-3

Range of Invalid Data Values: 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 2796 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q29a_1. Mother member of Swedish state church


Which one? - Mother: Swedish state church

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Marked

1637

Sysmiss.

1183

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-1

Summary Statistics: Valid 1637 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q29a_2. Mother member of "Free churches"


Which one? - Mother: "Free churches"

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Marked

80

Sysmiss.

2740

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-1

Summary Statistics: Valid 80 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q29a_3. Mother member of Catholic church


Which one? - Mother: Catholic church

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Marked

104

Sysmiss.

2716

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-1

Summary Statistics: Valid 104 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q29a_4. Mother member of Orthodox church


Which one? - Mother: Orthodox church

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Marked

48

Sysmiss.

2772

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-1

Summary Statistics: Valid 48 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q29a_5. Mother member of Judaic congregation


Which one? - Mother: Judaic congregation

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Marked

13

Sysmiss.

2807

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-1

Summary Statistics: Valid 13 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q29a_6.Mother member of Muslim congregation


Which one? - Mother: Muslim congregation

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Marked

37

Sysmiss.

2783

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-1

Summary Statistics: Valid 37 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q29a_7. Mother member of other religious congregation


Which one? - Mother: Other religious congregation

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Marked

13

Sysmiss.

2807

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-1

Summary Statistics: Valid 13 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q29a_8. Mother - don't know/does not apply


Which one? - Mother: Don't know/does not apply

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Marked

78

Sysmiss.

2742

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-1

Summary Statistics: Valid 78 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q29b_1. Father member of Swedish state church


Which one? - Father: Swedish state church

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Marked

1500

Sysmiss.

1320

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-1

Summary Statistics: Valid 1500 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q29b_2. Father member of "Free churches"


Which one? - Father: "Free churches"

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Marked

77

Sysmiss.

2743

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-1

Summary Statistics: Valid 77 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q29b_3. Father member of Catholic church


Which one? - Father: Catholic church

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Marked

54

Sysmiss.

2766

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-1

Summary Statistics: Valid 54 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q29b_4. Father member of Orthodox church


Which one? - Father: Orthodox church

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Marked

46

Sysmiss.

2774

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-1

Summary Statistics: Valid 46 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q29b_5. Father member of Judaic congregation


Which one? - Father: Judisk församling

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Marked

13

Sysmiss.

2807

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-1

Summary Statistics: Valid 13 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q29b_6. Father member of Muslim congregation


Which one? - Father: Other religious congregation

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Marked

47

Sysmiss.

2773

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-1

Summary Statistics: Valid 47 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q29b_7. Father member of other religious congregation


Which one? - Father: Annat religiöst samfund

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Marked

19

Sysmiss.

2801

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-1

Summary Statistics: Valid 19 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q29b_7. Father - Don't know/does not apply


Which one? - Father: Don't know/does not apply

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Marked

220

Sysmiss.

2600

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-1

Summary Statistics: Valid 220 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q30a. Importance of religion - Mother


How important would you say that religion is in your parents live - Mother

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Very important

243

2.

Rather important

354

3.

Of little or no importance

1936

4.

Don't know/does not apply

237

9.

Missing

50

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-3

Range of Invalid Data Values: 4, 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 2533 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q30b. Importance of religion - Father


How important would you say that religion is in your parents live- Father

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Very important

195

2.

Rather important

208

3.

Of little or no importance

1963

4.

Don't know/does not apply

363

9.

Missing

91

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-3

Range of Invalid Data Values: 4, 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 2366 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q31. R lives together with a partner


Do you live together with a partner (cohabiter or spouse)?

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Yes, with a partner of the opposite sex

1480

2.

Yes, with a partner of the same sex

15

3.

No

1273

9.

Missing

52

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-3

Range of Invalid Data Values: 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 2768 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q32. R have a relationship with someone not living with


Do you have a relationship with someone whom you don't live with?

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Yes

557

2.

No

1015

9.

Missing/does not apply

1248

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-2

Range of Invalid Data Values: 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 1572 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q33. Length of live-apart relationship


How long have you been together?

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

< 3 months

134

2.

3-12 months

192

3.

1-3 years

159

4.

> 3 years

181

9.

Missing/does not apply

2154

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-4

Range of Invalid Data Values: 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 666 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q34. R will start cohabiting with partner


Do you think you will start cohabiting within the coming year?

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Yes, probably

181

2.

No, unlikely

203

3.

Don't know

183

9.

Missing/does not apply

2253

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-3

Range of Invalid Data Values: 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 567 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q35. Children in respondents household


Are there any children in your household?

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Yes

736

2.

No

2057

9.

Missing

27

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-2

Range of Invalid Data Values: 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 2793 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q36a_1. Year of birth, biological child 1


When were the children born? Are they boys or girls? - Biological child 1: Year of birth

Value

Label

Frequency

79.

1979

1

85.

1985

1

86.

1986

3

87.

1987

7

88.

1988

10

89.

1989

20

90.

1990

38

91.

1991

44

92.

1992

45

93.

1993

61

94.

1994

73

95.

1995

76

96.

1996

94

97.

1997

97

98.

1998

89

99.

1999

29

Sysmiss.

2132

Range of Valid Data Values: 79-99

Summary Statistics: Valid 688 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q36a_2. Month, biological child 1


When were the children born? Are they boys or girls? - Biological child 1: Month

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

January

60

2.

February

66

3.

March

56

4.

April

74

5.

May

51

6.

June

63

7.

July

54

8.

August

45

9.

September

62

10.

October

57

11.

November

55

12.

December

46

Sysmiss.

2131

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-12

Summary Statistics: Valid 689 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q36a_3. Gender, biological child 1


When were the children born? Are they boys or girls? - Biological child 1: Gender

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Boy

378

2.

Girl

312

Sysmiss.

2130

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-2

Summary Statistics: Valid 690 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q36a_4. Year of birth, other child 1


When were the children born? Are they boys or girls? - Other child 1: Year of birth

Value

Label

Frequency

73.

1

77.

1

81.

6

82.

1

83.

2

85.

4

86.

2

87.

3

88.

10

89.

7

90.

12

91.

16

92.

7

93.

6

94.

6

95.

2

96.

3

97.

5

98.

1

Sysmiss.

2725

Range of Valid Data Values: 73-98

Summary Statistics: Valid 95 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q36a_5. Month, other child 1


When were the children born? Are they boys or girls? - Other child 1: Month

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

January

10

2.

February

7

3.

March

8

4.

April

14

5.

May

4

6.

June

7

7.

July

5

8.

August

10

9.

September

8

10.

October

8

11.

November

7

12.

December

3

Sysmiss.

2729

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-12

Summary Statistics: Valid 91 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q36a_6. Gender, other child 1


When were the children born? Are they boys or girls? - Other child 1: Gender

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Boy

42

2.

Girl

52

Sysmiss.

2726

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-2

Summary Statistics: Valid 94 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q36b_1. Year of birth, biological child 2


When were the children born? Are they boys or girls? - Biological child 2: Year of birth

Value

Label

Frequency

80.

1980

1

89.

1989

4

90.

1990

4

91.

1991

15

92.

1992

20

93.

1993

29

94.

1994

34

95.

1995

37

96.

1996

48

97.

1997

43

98.

1998

90

99.

1999

23

Sysmiss.

2472

Range of Valid Data Values: 80-99

Summary Statistics: Valid 348 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q36b_2. Month, biological child 2


When were the children born? Are they boys or girls? - Biological child 2: Month

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

January

29

2.

February

31

3.

March

41

4.

April

33

5.

May

25

6.

June

22

7.

July

44

8.

August

33

9.

September

14

10.

October

21

11.

November

22

12.

December

32

Sysmiss.

2473

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-12

Summary Statistics: Valid 347 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q36b_3. Gender, biological child 2


When were the children born? Are they boys or girls? - Biological child 2: Gender

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Boy

179

2.

Girl

164

Sysmiss.

2477

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-2

Summary Statistics: Valid 343 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q36b_4. Year of birth, other child 2


When were the children born? Are they boys or girls? - Other child 2: Year of birth

Value

Label

Frequency

72.

1972

1

81.

1981

1

83.

1983

1

85.

1985

2

87.

1987

1

88.

1988

1

89.

1989

4

90.

1990

1

91.

1991

5

92.

1992

5

93.

1993

5

95.

1995

3

96.

1996

1

Sysmiss.

2789

Range of Valid Data Values: 72-96

Summary Statistics: Valid 31 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q36b_5. Month, other child 2


When were the children born? Are they boys or girls? - Other child 2: Month

Value

Label

Frequency

2.

February

1

3.

March

5

4.

April

2

5.

May

2

6.

June

4

7.

July

4

8.

August

2

9.

September

4

10.

October

1

11.

November

1

12.

December

1

Sysmiss.

2793

Range of Valid Data Values: 2-12

Summary Statistics: Valid 27 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q36b_6. Gender, other child 2


When were the children born? Are they boys or girls? - Other child 2: Gender

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Boy

15

2.

Girl

15

Sysmiss.

2790

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-2

Summary Statistics: Valid 30 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q36c_1. Year of birth, biological child 3


When were the children born? Are they boys or girls? - Biological child 3: Year of birth

Value

Label

Frequency

90.

1990

1

92.

1992

1

93.

1993

3

94.

1994

10

95.

1995

8

96.

1996

9

97.

1997

8

98.

1998

11

99.

1999

3

Sysmiss.

2766

Range of Valid Data Values: 90-99

Summary Statistics: Valid 54 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q36c_2. Month, biological child 3


When were the children born? Are they boys or girls? - Biological child 3: Month

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

January

6

2.

February

1

3.

March

5

4.

April

6

5.

May

2

6.

June

3

7.

July

5

8.

August

6

9.

September

8

10.

October

4

11.

November

3

12.

December

6

Sysmiss.

2765

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-12

Summary Statistics: Valid 55 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q36c_3. Gender, biological child 3


When were the children born? Are they boys or girls? - Biological child 3: Gender

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Boy

25

2.

Girl

29

Sysmiss.

2766

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-2

Summary Statistics: Valid 54 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q36c_4. Year of birth, other child 3


When were the children born? Are they boys or girls? - Other child 3: Year of birth

Value

Label

Frequency

84.

1984

1

85.

1985

1

86.

1986

1

87.

1987

1

88.

1988

1

90.

1990

1

91.

1991

1

95.

1995

1

97.

1997

1

Sysmiss.

2811

Range of Valid Data Values: 84-97

Summary Statistics: Valid 9 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q36c_5. Month, other child 3


When were the children born? Are they boys or girls? - Other child 3: Month

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

January

1

4.

April

2

6.

June

3

8.

August

2

Sysmiss.

2812

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-8

Summary Statistics: Valid 8 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q36c_6. Gender, other child 3


When were the children born? Are they boys or girls? - Other child 3: Gender

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Boy

3

2.

Girl

6

Sysmiss.

2811

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-2

Summary Statistics: Valid 9 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q37a. Biological children not living with R


Do you have biological children whom you don't live with?

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

No

2702

2.

Yes

40

9.

Missing

78

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-9

Range of Invalid Data Values: 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 2742 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q37b_1. Year of birth, biological child 1, not in hh


Child who does not live with you - Biological child 1: Year of birth

Value

Label

Frequency

87.

1987

1

88.

1988

2

89.

1989

4

90.

1990

6

91.

1991

1

92.

1992

7

93.

1993

7

94.

1994

3

95.

1995

3

96.

1996

3

97.

1997

1

99.

1999

2

Sysmiss.

2780

Range of Valid Data Values: 87-99

Summary Statistics: Valid 40 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q37b_2. Month, biological child 1, not in hh


Child who does not live with you - Biological child 1: Month

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

January

3

2.

February

5

3.

March

2

4.

April

4

5.

May

4

6.

June

6

7.

July

1

8.

August

3

9.

September

3

10.

October

4

11.

November

3

12.

December

3

Sysmiss.

2779

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-12

Summary Statistics: Valid 41 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q37b_3. Place of living, biological child 1, not in hh


Child who does not live with you - Biological child 1: Place of living

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

With the other parent

37

2.

Other

4

Sysmiss.

2779

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-2

Summary Statistics: Valid 41 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q37c_1. Year of birth, biological child 2, not in hh


Child who does not live with you - Biological child 2: Year of birth

Value

Label

Frequency

92.

1992

2

93.

1993

2

94.

1994

5

95.

1995

3

Sysmiss.

2808

Range of Valid Data Values: 92-95

Summary Statistics: Valid 12 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q37c_2. Month, biological child 2, not in hh


Child who does not live with you - Biological child 2: Month

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

January

1

2.

February

2

4.

April

1

5.

May

1

8.

August

1

9.

September

2

10.

October

2

11.

November

1

12.

December

1

Sysmiss.

2808

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-12

Summary Statistics: Valid 12 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q37c_3. Place of living, biological child 2, not in hh


Child who does not live with you - Biological child 2: Place of living

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

With the other parent

10

2.

Other

2

Sysmiss.

2808

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-2

Summary Statistics: Valid 12 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q37d_1. Year of birth, biological child 3, not in hh


Child who does not live with you - Biological child 3: Year of birth

Value

Label

Frequency

Sysmiss.

2820

Summary Statistics: Valid 0 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q37d_2. Month, biological child 3, not in hh


Child who does not live with you - Biological child 3: Month

Value

Label

Frequency

Sysmiss.

2820

Summary Statistics: Valid 0 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q37d_3. Place of living, biological child 3, not in hh


Child who does not live with you - Biological child 3: Place of living

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

With the other parent

1

2.

Other

0

Sysmiss.

2819

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-2

Summary Statistics: Valid 1 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q38. More children in the future


Do you think you will have (more) children in the future?

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Yes

1884

2.

Perhaps

678

3.

No

246

9.

Missing

12

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-3

Range of Invalid Data Values: 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 2808 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q39a. How many more children in the future?


As things stand today, how many (more) children do you want? - Number of children

Value

Label

Frequency

0.

24

1.

358

2.

1179

3.

392

4.

56

5.

12

6.

1

7.

2

9.

1

10.

1

14.

1

23.

2

38.

1

Sysmiss.

790

Range of Valid Data Values: 0-38

Summary Statistics: Valid 2030 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q39b. Don't know how many more children


As things stand today, how many (more) children do you want? - Don't know how many

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

571

Sysmiss.

2249

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-1

Summary Statistics: Valid 571 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q40. When next child?


When do you think you will have your first (next) child?

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

< 2 years

474

2.

2-5 years

933

3.

> 5 years

628

4.

Don't know

531

9.

Not reported

254

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-4

Range of Invalid Data Values: 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 2566 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q41. Married or cohabiting before


Have you been married or cohabiting before?

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Yes

812

2.

No

1995

9.

Missing

13

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-2

Range of Invalid Data Values: 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 2807 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q42a_1. Year when R moved in together with partner, first union


State year and month of moving in together, of marriage (if appropriate) and of moving apart. - First union: Moving in together (year)

Value

Label

Frequency

22.

22

1

81.

1981

1

83.

1983

3

84.

1984

6

85.

1985

14

86.

1986

27

87.

1987

46

88.

1988

54

89.

1989

81

90.

1990

76

91.

1991

106

92.

1992

89

93.

1993

70

94.

1994

88

95.

1995

75

96.

1996

91

97.

1997

55

98.

1998

27

99.

1999

4

Sysmiss.

1906

Range of Valid Data Values: 22-99

Summary Statistics: Valid 914 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q42a_2. Month when R moved in together with partner, first union


State year and month of moving in together, of marriage (if appropriate) and of moving apart. - First union: Moving in together (month)

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

January

63

2.

February

43

3.

March

44

4.

April

41

5.

May

57

6.

June

72

7.

July

43

8.

August

81

9.

September

63

10.

October

45

11.

November

39

12.

December

34

21.

Winter

30

22.

Spring

84

23.

Summer

56

24.

Autumn

82

Sysmiss.

1943

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-24

Summary Statistics: Valid 877 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q42a_3. Year if appropriate of marriage, first union


State year and month of moving in together, of marriage (if appropriate) and of moving apart. - First union: Marriage if appropriate (year)

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

1

1

87.

1987

1

88.

1988

2

89.

1989

8

90.

1990

13

91.

1991

11

92.

1992

15

93.

1993

7

94.

1994

10

95.

1995

17

96.

1996

8

97.

1997

16

98.

1998

6

99.

1999

3

Sysmiss.

2702

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-99

Summary Statistics: Valid 118 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q42a_4. Month if appropriate of marriage, first union


State year and month of moving in together, of marriage (if appropriate) and of moving apart. - First union: Marriage if appropriate (month)

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

January

5

2.

February

2

3.

March

2

4.

April

5

5.

May

9

6.

June

22

7.

July

16

8.

August

18

9.

September

10

10.

October

2

11.

November

5

12.

December

8

21.

Winter

2

22.

Spring

3

23.

Summer

4

24.

Autumn

2

Sysmiss.

2705

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-24

Summary Statistics: Valid 115 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q42a_5. Year when R and partner moved apart, first union


State year and month of moving in together, of marriage (if appropriate) and of moving apart. - First union: Moving apart (year)

Value

Label

Frequency

23.

23

1

82.

1982

1

84.

1984

1

86.

1986

1

87.

1987

12

88.

1988

13

89.

1989

26

90.

1990

35

91.

1991

52

92.

1992

58

93.

1993

47

94.

1994

74

95.

1995

77

96.

1996

99

97.

1997

122

98.

1998

84

99.

1999

25

Sysmiss.

2092

Range of Valid Data Values: 23-99

Summary Statistics: Valid 728 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q42a_6. Month when R and partner moved apart, first union


State year and month of moving in together, of marriage (if appropriate) and of moving apart. - First union: Moving apart (month)

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

January

50

2.

February

40

3.

March

38

4.

April

50

5.

May

51

6.

June

36

7.

July

43

8.

August

51

9.

September

42

10.

October

31

11.

November

29

12.

December

42

21.

Winter

40

22.

Spring

56

23.

Summer

56

24.

Autumn

52

Sysmiss.

2113

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-24

Summary Statistics: Valid 707 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q42b_1. Year when R moved in together with partner, second union


State year and month of moving in together, of marriage (if appropriate) and of moving apart. - Second union: Moving in together (year)

Value

Label

Frequency

23.

23

1

87.

1987

4

88.

1988

4

89.

1989

6

90.

1990

11

91.

1991

14

92.

1992

12

93.

1993

19

94.

1994

27

95.

1995

34

96.

1996

33

97.

1997

30

98.

1998

16

99.

1999

7

Sysmiss.

2602

Range of Valid Data Values: 23-99

Summary Statistics: Valid 218 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q42b_2. Month when R moved in together with partner, second union


State year and month of moving in together, of marriage (if appropriate) and of moving apart. - Second union: Moving in together (month)

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

January

22

2.

February

18

3.

March

8

4.

April

11

5.

May

6

6.

June

10

7.

July

10

8.

August

19

9.

September

18

10.

October

7

11.

November

8

12.

December

7

21.

Winter

11

22.

Spring

19

23.

Summer

15

24.

Autumn

19

Sysmiss.

2612

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-24

Summary Statistics: Valid 208 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q42b_3. Year if appropriate of marriage, second union


State year and month of moving in together, of marriage (if appropriate) and of moving apart. - Second union: Marriage if appropriate (year)

Value

Label

Frequency

89.

1989

1

93.

1993

1

94.

1994

2

95.

1995

2

96.

1996

1

97.

1997

5

98.

1998

4

99.

1999

3

Sysmiss.

2801

Range of Valid Data Values: 89-99

Summary Statistics: Valid 19 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q42b_4. Month if appropriate of marriage, second union


State year and month of moving in together, of marriage (if appropriate) and of moving apart. - Second union: Marriage if appropriate (month)

Value

Label

Frequency

4.

April

3

5.

May

5

6.

June

3

7.

July

1

8.

August

3

9.

September

2

21.

Winter

2

Sysmiss.

2801

Range of Valid Data Values: 4-24

Summary Statistics: Valid 19 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q42b_5. Year when R and partner moved apart, second union


State year and month of moving in together, of marriage (if appropriate) and of moving apart. - Second union: Moving apart (year)

Value

Label

Frequency

22.

22

1

90.

1990

4

91.

1991

1

92.

1992

8

93.

1993

8

94.

1994

12

95.

1995

20

96.

1996

28

97.

1997

25

98.

1998

35

99.

1999

7

Sysmiss.

2671

Range of Valid Data Values: 22-99

Summary Statistics: Valid 149 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q42b_6. Month when R and partner moved apart, second union


State year and month of moving in together, of marriage (if appropriate) and of moving apart. - Second union: Moving apart (month)

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

January

8

2.

February

14

3.

March

11

4.

April

6

5.

May

2

6.

June

11

7.

July

4

8.

August

12

9.

September

8

10.

October

10

11.

November

7

12.

December

8

21.

Winter

6

22.

Spring

19

23.

Summer

8

24.

Autumn

9

Sysmiss.

2677

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-24

Summary Statistics: Valid 143 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q42c_1. Year when R moved in together with partner, third union


State year and month of moving in together, of marriage (if appropriate) and of moving apart. - Third union: Moving in together (year)

Value

Label

Frequency

90.

1990

1

91.

1991

2

92.

1992

3

93.

1993

2

94.

1994

2

95.

1995

3

96.

1996

9

97.

1997

8

98.

1998

12

Sysmiss.

2778

Range of Valid Data Values: 90-98

Summary Statistics: Valid 42 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q42c_2. Month when R moved in together with partner, third union


State year and month of moving in together, of marriage (if appropriate) and of moving apart. - Third union: Moving in together (month)

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

January

2

2.

February

1

3.

March

1

4.

April

5

5.

May

1

6.

June

3

7.

July

1

9.

September

2

10.

October

1

11.

November

1

12.

December

4

21.

Winter

4

22.

Spring

4

23.

Summer

3

24.

Autumn

3

Sysmiss.

2784

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-24

Summary Statistics: Valid 36 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q42c_3. Year if appropriate of marriage, third union


State year and month of moving in together, of marriage (if appropriate) and of moving apart. - Third union: Marriage if appropriate (year)

Value

Label

Frequency

0.

0

2

92.

1992

1

93.

1993

1

94.

1994

1

95.

1995

1

97.

1997

1

98.

1998

1

Sysmiss.

2812

Range of Valid Data Values: 0-98

Summary Statistics: Valid 8 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q42c_4. Month if appropriate of marriage, third union


State year and month of moving in together, of marriage (if appropriate) and of moving apart. - Third union: Marriage if appropriate (month)

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

January

1

4.

April

1

6.

June

2

7.

July

2

9.

September

2

Sysmiss.

2812

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-24

Summary Statistics: Valid 8 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q42c_5. Year when R and partner moved apart, third union


State year and month of moving in together, of marriage (if appropriate) and of moving apart. - Third union: Moving apart (year)

Value

Label

Frequency

88.

1988

1

92.

1992

2

94.

1994

1

95.

1995

1

96.

1996

3

97.

1997

3

98.

1998

11

99.

1999

1

Sysmiss.

2797

Range of Valid Data Values: 88-99

Summary Statistics: Valid 23 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q42c_6. Month when R and partner moved apart, third union


State year and month of moving in together, of marriage (if appropriate) and of moving apart. - Third union: Moving apart (month)

Value

Label

Frequency

2.

February

1

3.

March

3

6.

June

2

7.

July

2

8.

August

2

9.

September

1

10.

October

1

12.

December

1

21.

Winter

2

22.

Spring

1

23.

Summer

2

24.

Autumn

2

Sysmiss.

2800

Range of Valid Data Values: 2-24

Summary Statistics: Valid 20 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q43c_1. Permanent work


What is your current occupation? - Permanent work

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Marked

1378

Sysmiss.

1442

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-1

Summary Statistics: Valid 1378 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q43_2. Casual work


What is your current occupation? - Casual work

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Marked

441

Sysmiss.

2379

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-1

Summary Statistics: Valid 441 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q43_3. Self employed


What is your current occupation? - Own business, free-lance or similar

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Marked

130

Sysmiss.

2690

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-1

Summary Statistics: Valid 130 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q43_4. Studies


What is your current occupation? - Studies

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Marked

800

Sysmiss.

2020

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-1

Summary Statistics: Valid 800 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q43_5. Kunskapslyftet


What is your current occupation? - Kunskapslyftet

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Marked

77

Sysmiss.

2743

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-1

Summary Statistics: Valid 77 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q43_6. Employement measures


What is your current occupation? - Employement measures

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Marked

53

Sysmiss.

2767

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-1

Summary Statistics: Valid 53 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q43_7. Unemployed 6 months or more


What is your current occupation? - Unemployed 6 months or more

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Marked

55

Sysmiss.

2765

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-1

Summary Statistics: Valid 55 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q43_8. Unemployed less than 6 months


What is your current occupation? - Unemployed less than 6 months

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Marked

111

Sysmiss.

2709

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-1

Summary Statistics: Valid 111 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q43_9. Parental leave


What is your current occupation? - Parental leave

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Marked

139

Sysmiss.

2681

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-1

Summary Statistics: Valid 139 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q43_10. Housekeeping (full-time)


What is your current occupation? - Housekeeping (full-time)

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Marked

18

Sysmiss.

2802

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-1

Summary Statistics: Valid 18 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q43_11. Military service


What is your current occupation? - Military service

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Marked

3

Sysmiss.

2817

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-1

Summary Statistics: Valid 3 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q43_12. Other occupation


What is your current occupation? - Other

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Marked

170

Sysmiss.

2650

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-1

Summary Statistics: Valid 170 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q43txt. Comment available


Comment

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Marked

170

Sysmiss.

2650

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-1

Summary Statistics: Valid 170 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q44a. Work hours/week


How many hours per week do you work right now? - Hours per week

Range of Valid Data Values: 0-99

Summary Statistics: Valid 2014 ; Min. 0 ; Max. 99 ; Mean 37.468 ; StDev 12.786

Variable Format: numeric


Q44b. Don't work right now


How many hours per week do you work right now? - I don't work right now

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Marked

791

Sysmiss.

2029

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-1

Summary Statistics: Valid 791 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q45. Education R is studying for


If a student, what degree are you studying for?

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

High school

154

2.

College

664

3.

Other

148

9.

Missing/does not apply

1854

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-3

Range of Invalid Data Values: 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 966 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q45txt. Comment available


Comment

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Marked

147

Sysmiss.

2673

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-1

Summary Statistics: Valid 147 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q46a. Studying - number of years after age 16


After age 16, roughly how many years have you spent...? - Studying

Value

Label

Frequency

0.

0

7

1.

1

80

2.

2

369

3.

3

465

4.

4

409

5.

5

292

6.

6

320

7.

7

216

8.

8

109

9.

9

78

10.

10

53

11.

11

15

12.

12

14

13.

13

11

14.

14

5

15.

15

7

16.

16

5

19.

19

1

21.

21

2

Sysmiss.

362

Range of Valid Data Values: 0-21

Summary Statistics: Valid 2458 ; Mean 4.734 ; StDev 2.548

Variable Format: numeric


Q46b. Working - number of years after age 16


After age 16, roughly how many years have you spent...? - Working

Value

Label

Frequency

0.

0

27

1.

1

332

2.

2

282

3.

3

291

4.

4

266

5.

5

210

6.

6

198

7.

7

159

8.

8

160

9.

9

124

10.

10

136

11.

11

81

12.

12

102

13.

13

65

14.

14

20

15.

15

13

16.

16

1

19.

19

1

22.

22

1

Sysmiss.

351

Range of Valid Data Values: 0-22

Summary Statistics: Valid 2469 ; Mean 5.44 ; StDev 3.642

Variable Format: numeric


Q46c. Unemployed - number of years after age 16


After age 16, roughly how many years have you spent...? - Unemployed

Value

Label

Frequency

0.

0

142

1.

1

480

2.

2

139

3.

3

67

4.

4

30

5.

5

25

6.

6

11

7.

7

9

8.

8

3

9.

9

3

10.

10

2

11.

11

1

Sysmiss.

1908

Range of Valid Data Values: 0-11

Summary Statistics: Valid 912 ; Mean 1.552 ; StDev 1.533

Variable Format: numeric


Q46d. Other - number of years after age 16


After age 16, roughly how many years have you spent...? - Other

Value

Label

Frequency

0.

0

72

1.

1

509

2.

2

135

3.

3

48

4.

4

13

5.

5

15

6.

6

4

7.

7

4

8.

8

1

9.

9

1

12.

12

1

Sysmiss.

2017

Range of Valid Data Values: 0-12

Summary Statistics: Valid 803 ; Mean 1.408 ; StDev 1.171

Variable Format: numeric


Q47a. Occupation (SEI)


Current occupation

Value

Label

Frequency

11.

Unskilled employees in goods production

201

12.

Unskilled employees in service production

594

21.

Skilled employees in goods production

239

22.

Skilled employees in service production

209

33.

Assistant non-manual employees, lower level I

160

36.

Assistant non-manual employees, lower level II

245

46.

Intermediate non-manual employees

508

56.

Professionals and other higher non-manual employees

237

57.

Upper-level executives

5

60.

Self-employed professionals

5

79.

Entrepeneurs

82

89.

Farmers

5

94.

94

3

98.

98

144

99.

99

12

Sysmiss.

171

Range of Valid Data Values: 11-99

Summary Statistics: Valid 2649 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q47b. Have not yet had a job


I have not yet had a job

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Marked

155

Sysmiss.

2665

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-1

Summary Statistics: Valid 155 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q48_1. Current job - pays well


Current job - It pays well

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Applies completely

380

2.

Applies partially

969

3.

Does not apply at all

680

9.

Missing/does not apply

791

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-3

Range of Invalid Data Values: 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 2029 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q48_2.Current job - often stressful


Current job - It is often stressful

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Applies completely

826

2.

Applies partially

1052

3.

Does not apply at all

162

9.

Missing/does not apply

780

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-3

Range of Invalid Data Values: 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 2040 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q48_3. Current job - involves a lot of overtime work


Current job - It involves a lot of overtime work

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Applies completely

464

2.

Applies partially

958

3.

Does not apply at all

611

9.

Missing/does not apply

787

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-3

Range of Invalid Data Values: 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 2033 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q48_4. Current job - a lot of business travel


Current job - It involves a lot of business travel

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Applies completely

197

2.

Applies partially

409

3.

Does not apply at all

1423

9.

Missing/does not apply

791

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-3

Range of Invalid Data Values: 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 2029 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q48_5. Current job - a lot of inconvenient working hours


Current job - It involves work at night, in the evening and/or on weekends

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Applies completely

615

2.

Applies partially

655

3.

Does not apply at all

756

9.

Missing/does not apply

794

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-3

Range of Invalid Data Values: 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 2026 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q48_6. Current job - good career possibilities


Current job - It provides good career possibilities

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Applies completely

282

2.

Applies partially

719

3.

Does not apply at all

1028

9.

Missing/does not apply

791

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-3

Range of Invalid Data Values: 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 2029 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q48_7. Current job - good opportunities to develop competence


Current job - It provides good opportunities to develop competence

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Applies completely

455

2.

Applies partially

927

3.

Does not apply at all

645

9.

Missing/does not apply

793

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-3

Range of Invalid Data Values: 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 2027 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q48_8. Current job - satisfaction of doing a good job


Current job - It provides the satisfaction of doing a good job

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Applies completely

818

2.

Applies partially

880

3.

Does not apply at all

337

9.

Missing/does not apply

785

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-3

Range of Invalid Data Values: 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 2035 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q48_9. Current job - good social enviroment with fellow workers


Current job - It provides a good social enviroment with your fellow workers

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Applies completely

1237

2.

Applies partially

681

3.

Does not apply at all

121

9.

Missing/does not apply

781

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-3

Range of Invalid Data Values: 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 2039 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q48_10. Current job - easy to take parental leave


Current job - It makes it easy to take parental leave

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Applies completely

794

2.

Applies partially

783

3.

Does not apply at all

417

9.

Missing/does not apply

826

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-3

Range of Invalid Data Values: 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 1994 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q48_11. Current job - easy to work part-time


Current job - It makes it easy to work part-time to have time for one's family

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Applies completely

521

2.

Applies partially

778

3.

Does not apply at all

701

9.

Missing/does not apply

820

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-3

Range of Invalid Data Values: 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 2000 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q48_12. Current job - long travel times to and from work


Current job - It involves long travel times to and from work

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Applies completely

198

2.

Applies partially

433

3.

Does not apply at all

1390

9.

Missing/does not apply

799

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-3

Range of Invalid Data Values: 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 2021 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q49. Gender distribution at work place


What is the gender distribution at your work place?

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Mostly women

664

2.

Mixed

630

3.

Mostly men

766

9.

Missing/does not apply

760

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-3

Range of Invalid Data Values: 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 2060 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q50. R invests in this job for the future


Do you invest in this job for the future?

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Yes

635

2.

Perhaps

609

3.

No

575

4.

Don't know

243

9.

Missing/does not apply

758

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-4

Range of Invalid Data Values: 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 2062 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q51. Importance of work in respondents life


How important is work in your life?

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

1 - One of the least important things in my life

38

2.

2

125

3.

3

641

4.

4

1209

5.

5 - One of the most important things in my life

744

6.

Don't know

39

9.

Missing

24

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-6

Range of Invalid Data Values: 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 2796 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q52_1. Good job - to think and act independently


What does a good job mean to you? - That I can think and act independently

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

1 Unimportant

8

2.

2

23

3.

3

241

4.

4

822

5.

5 Very important

1695

6.

Don't know

12

9.

Missing

19

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-6

Range of Invalid Data Values: 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 2801 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q52_2. Good job - offers good possibilities to advance


What does a good job mean to you? - That it offers good possibilities to advance

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

1 Unimportant

74

2.

2

162

3.

3

645

4.

4

916

5.

5 Very important

958

6.

Don't know

31

9.

Missing

34

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-6

Range of Invalid Data Values: 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 2786 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q52_3. Good job - proud of work


What does a good job mean to you? - That I can be proud of my work

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

1 Unimportant

13

2.

2

57

3.

3

292

4.

4

788

5.

5 Very important

1625

6.

Don't know

15

9.

Missing

30

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-6

Range of Invalid Data Values: 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 2790 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q52_4. Good job - useful for society


What does a good job mean to you? - That my work is useful for society

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

1 Unimportant

178

2.

2

316

3.

3

824

4.

4

874

5.

5 Very important

550

6.

Don't know

51

9.

Missing

27

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-6

Range of Invalid Data Values: 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 2793 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q52_5. Good job - to meet a lot of people


What does a good job mean to you? - That I meet a lot of people

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

1 Unimportant

51

2.

2

158

3.

3

644

4.

4

1004

5.

5 Very important

930

6.

Don't know

10

9.

Missing

23

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-6

Range of Invalid Data Values: 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 2797 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q52_6. Good job - to avoid shift work or work overtime


What does a good job mean to you? - That I don't have to do shift work or work overtime

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

1 Unimportant

577

2.

2

595

3.

3

687

4.

4

422

5.

5 Very important

463

6.

Don't know

37

9.

Missing

39

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-6

Range of Invalid Data Values: 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 2781 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q52_7. Good job - influence work situation


What does a good job mean to you? - That I can influence my work situation

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

1 Unimportant

11

2.

2

35

3.

3

321

4.

4

1015

5.

5 Very important

1388

6.

Don't know

19

9.

Missing

31

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-6

Range of Invalid Data Values: 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 2789 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q52_8.Good job - high salary and/or other benefits


What does a good job mean to you? - That I get a high salary and/or other benefits

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

1 Unimportant

37

2.

2

110

3.

3

540

4.

4

1187

5.

5 Very important

895

6.

Don't know

10

9.

Missing

41

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-6

Range of Invalid Data Values: 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 2779 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q52_9. Good job - possibility to help other people


What does a good job mean to you? - That I can help other people

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

1 Unimportant

94

2.

2

285

3.

3

759

4.

4

788

5.

5 Very important

833

6.

Don't know

40

9.

Missing

21

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-6

Range of Invalid Data Values: 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 2799 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q52_10. Good job - many good work mates


What does a good job mean to you? - That I have many good work mates

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

1 Unimportant

20

2.

2

44

3.

3

263

4.

4

875

5.

5 Very important

1588

6.

Don't know

8

9.

Missing

22

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-6

Range of Invalid Data Values: 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 2798 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q52_11. Good job - secure employment with regular income


What does a good job mean to you? - That I have a secure employment with a regular income

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

1 Unimportant

36

2.

2

91

3.

3

306

4.

4

718

5.

5 Very important

1630

6.

Don't know

11

9.

Missing

28

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-6

Range of Invalid Data Values: 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 2792 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q52_12. Good job - no problem to take parental leave and/or work part-time


What does a good job mean to you? - That I can take parental leave and/or work part-time without facing difficulties at work

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

1 Unimportant

72

2.

2

159

3.

3

470

4.

4

755

5.

5 Very important

1224

6.

Don't know

110

9.

Missing

30

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-6

Range of Invalid Data Values: 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 2790 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q52b. Most important for respondent


Which one of these is the most important for you?

Value

Label

Frequency

0.

0

8

1.

That I can think and act independently

452

2.

That it offers good possibilities to advance

41

3.

That I can be proud of my work

187

4.

That my work is useful for society

39

5.

That I meet a lot of people

58

6.

That I don't have to do shift work or work overtime

12

7.

That I can influence my work situation

227

8.

That I get a high salary and/or other benefits

201

9.

That I can help other people

164

10.

That I have many good work mates

355

11.

That I have a secure employment with a regular income

711

12.

That I can take parental leave and/or work part-time without facing difficulties at work

301

Sysmiss.

64

Range of Valid Data Values: 0-12

Summary Statistics: Valid 2756 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q52c. Second most important for respondent


Which one is the second most important?

Value

Label

Frequency

0.

0

7

1.

That I can think and act independently

252

2.

That it offers good possibilities to advance

92

3.

That I can be proud of my work

172

4.

That my work is useful for society

61

5.

That I meet a lot of people

137

6.

That I don't have to do shift work or work overtime

43

7.

That I can influence my work situation

319

8.

That I get a high salary and/or other benefits

292

9.

That I can help other people

145

10.

That I have many good work mates

489

11.

That I have a secure employment with a regular income

485

12.

That I can take parental leave and/or work part-time without facing difficulties at work

258

Sysmiss.

68

Range of Valid Data Values: 0-12

Summary Statistics: Valid 2752 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q53. Best arrangement for a family with preschool children


What do you think would be the best arrangement for a family with preschool children?

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Only the man works

188

2.

Both work, woman works part-time

461

3.

Both work, man works part-time

12

4.

Both parents work roughly the same

1932

5.

Don't know

185

9.

Missing

42

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-5

Range of Invalid Data Values: 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 2778 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q54_1. Enjoy children


Here are some statements about children and family. What do you think? - I enjoy children

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

1 - Don't agree at all

36

2.

2

126

3.

3

362

4.

4

654

5.

5 - Agree completely

1569

6.

Don't know

38

9.

Missing

35

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-6

Range of Invalid Data Values: 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 2785 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q54_2. Satisfied with life if good parent


Here are some statements about children and family. What do you think? - I think I can be satisfied with my life if I am a good parent

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

1 - Don't agree at all

71

2.

2

127

3.

3

483

4.

4

854

5.

5 - Agree completely

966

6.

Don't know

245

9.

Missing

74

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-6

Range of Invalid Data Values: 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 2746 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q54_3. Family is more rewarding than work


Here are some statements about children and family. What do you think? - Spending time with my family is more rewarding than work

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

1 - Don't agree at all

21

2.

2

62

3.

3

420

4.

4

813

5.

5 - Agree completely

1143

6.

Don't know

319

9.

Missing

42

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-6

Range of Invalid Data Values: 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 2778 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q54_4. It is a duty to have children


Here are some statements about children and family. What do you think? - It is my duty to society and/or to my (extended) family to have children

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

1 - Don't agree at all

1982

2.

2

363

3.

3

235

4.

4

88

5.

5 - Agree completely

44

6.

Don't know

67

9.

Missing

41

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-6

Range of Invalid Data Values: 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 2779 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q54_5. Children need siblings


Here are some statements about children and family. What do you think? - Children need siblings

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

1 - Don't agree at all

240

2.

2

293

3.

3

587

4.

4

716

5.

5 - Agree completely

823

6.

Don't know

93

9.

Missing

68

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-6

Range of Invalid Data Values: 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 2752 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q54_6. Children confirmation of good partner relationship


Here are some statements about children and family. What do you think? - To have children is a confirmation of a good partner relationship

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

1 - Don't agree at all

1385

2.

2

411

3.

3

431

4.

4

259

5.

5 - Agree completely

201

6.

Don't know

96

9.

Missing

37

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-6

Range of Invalid Data Values: 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 2783 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q55_1. If children - can no longer do whatever one wants


To become a parent can influence one's life in many different ways. What is your view of the following? - If I have children I can no longer do what I want

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

1 - Don't agree at all

195

2.

2

291

3.

3

500

4.

4

457

5.

5 - Agree completely

302

6.

Don't know

36

8.

INAP

537

9.

Missing/does not apply

502

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-6

Range of Invalid Data Values: 8, 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 1781 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q55_2. If children - economic problems


To become a parent can influence one's life in many different ways. What is your view of the following? - If I have children I (we) will have economic problems

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

1 - Don't agree at all

297

2.

2

492

3.

3

559

4.

4

248

5.

5 - Agree completely

72

6.

Don't know

110

8.

INAP

537

9.

Missing/does not apply

505

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-6

Range of Invalid Data Values: 8, 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 1778 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q55_3. If children - little time for friends


To become a parent can influence one's life in many different ways. What is your view of the following? - If I have children I will have little time for my friends

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

1 - Don't agree at all

226

2.

2

450

3.

3

671

4.

4

284

5.

5 - Agree completely

81

6.

Don't know

66

8.

INAP

537

9.

Missing/does not apply

505

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-6

Range of Invalid Data Values: 8, 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 1778 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q55_4. If children - relationship with partner will improve


To become a parent can influence one's life in many different ways. What is your view of the following? - If I have children my relationship with my partner will improve

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

1 - Don't agree at all

230

2.

2

261

3.

3

522

4.

4

297

5.

5 - Agree completely

100

6.

Don't know

365

8.

INAP

537

9.

Missing/does not apply

508

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-6

Range of Invalid Data Values: 8, 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 1775 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q55_5. If children - life will be more meaningful


To become a parent can influence one's life in many different ways. What is your view of the following? - If I have children my life will be more meaningful

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

1 - Don't agree at all

78

2.

2

94

3.

3

334

4.

4

588

5.

5 - Agree completely

515

6.

Don't know

168

8.

INAP

537

9.

Missing/does not apply

506

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-6

Range of Invalid Data Values: 8, 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 1777 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q56_1. When children - could no longer do what I wanted


To become a parent can influence one's life in many different ways. What was it like for you? - When I had children I could no longer do what I wanted

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

1 - Don't agree at all

113

2.

2

116

3.

3

156

4.

4

142

5.

5 - Agree completely

100

6.

Don't know

28

8.

INAP

537

9.

Missing/does not apply

1628

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-6

Range of Invalid Data Values: 8, 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 655 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q56_2. When children - had economic problems


To become a parent can influence one's life in many different ways. What was it like for you? - When I had children I (we) had economic problems

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

1 - Don't agree at all

159

2.

2

147

3.

3

187

4.

4

89

5.

5 - Agree completely

41

6.

Don't know

26

8.

INAP

537

9.

Missing/does not apply

1634

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-6

Range of Invalid Data Values: 8, 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 649 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q56_3. When children - had little time for one's friends


To become a parent can influence one's life in many different ways. What was it like for you? - When I had children I had little time for my friends

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

1 - Don't agree at all

130

2.

2

157

3.

3

202

4.

4

96

5.

5 - Agree completely

38

6.

Don't know

27

8.

INAP

537

9.

Missing/does not apply

1633

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-6

Range of Invalid Data Values: 8, 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 650 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q56_4. When children - relationship with partner improved


To become a parent can influence one's life in many different ways. What was it like for you? - When I had children my relationship with my partner improved

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

1 - Don't agree at all

101

2.

2

87

3.

3

200

4.

4

137

5.

5 - Agree completely

79

6.

Don't know

48

8.

INAP

537

9.

Missing/does not apply

1631

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-6

Range of Invalid Data Values: 8, 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 652 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q56_5. When children - life was more meaningful


To become a parent can influence one's life in many different ways. What was it like for you? - When I had children my life was more meaningful

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

1 - Don't agree at all

14

2.

2

9

3.

3

41

4.

4

157

5.

5 - Agree completely

401

6.

Don't know

28

8.

INAP

537

9.

Missing/does not apply

1633

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-6

Range of Invalid Data Values: 8, 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 650 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q57a. Parental leave - respondent


In Sweden parents can share the parental leave. If/when you have children, how do you think you and your partner will divide the parental leave? - I

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

None/only the so-called daddy days

120

2.

Only the month that is not transferable to the other parent

163

3.

2-3 months

147

4.

4-5 months

119

5.

6-11 months

361

6.

12 months or more

552

7.

Don't know

929

9.

Missing

429

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-7

Range of Invalid Data Values: 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 2391 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q57b. Parental leave - partner


In Sweden parents can share the parental leave. If/when you have children, how do you think you and your partner will divide the parental leave? - Partner

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

None/only the so-called daddy days

160

2.

Only the month that is not transferable to the other parent

202

3.

2-3 months

182

4.

4-5 months

139

5.

6-11 months

301

6.

12 months or more

307

7.

Don't know

878

9.

Missing

651

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-7

Range of Invalid Data Values: 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 2169 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q58. Dividing responsibility - children


To take care of a child involves many different tasks. Do you think you and your partner will divide the responsibility?

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

R does/did the most

385

2.

Both share/shared equally

1703

3.

Partner does/did the most

253

4.

Don't know

367

9.

Missing

112

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-4

Range of Invalid Data Values: 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 2708 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q59_1. If cohabiting/married - Contacts with friends would be...


How do you think your life would be today if you lived together with a cohabiting partner or spouse? - Contacts with my friends would be...

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Much worse

22

2.

Somewhat worse

278

3.

Roughly the same as today

633

4.

Somewhat better

48

5.

Much better

14

8.

INAP

537

9.

Missing/does not apply

1288

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-5

Range of Invalid Data Values: 8, 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 995 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q59_2. If cohabiting/married - possibilities to invest wholeheartedly in education/job/career would be...


How do you think your life would be today if you lived together with a cohabiting partner or spouse? - My possibilities to invest wholeheartedly in education/job/career would be...

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Much worse

36

2.

Somewhat worse

181

3.

Roughly the same as today

691

4.

Somewhat better

67

5.

Much better

16

8.

INAP

537

9.

Missing/does not apply

1292

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-5

Range of Invalid Data Values: 8, 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 991 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q59_3. If cohabiting/married - freedom to do what one wants would be...


How do you think your life would be today if you lived together with a cohabiting partner or spouse? - My freedom to do what I want would be...

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Much worse

65

2.

Somewhat worse

371

3.

Roughly the same as today

501

4.

Somewhat better

46

5.

Much better

7

8.

INAP

537

9.

Missing/does not apply

1293

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-5

Range of Invalid Data Values: 8, 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 990 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q59_4. If cohabiting/married - general well-being would be...


How do you think your life would be today if you lived together with a cohabiting partner or spouse? - My general well-being would be...

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Much worse

8

2.

Somewhat worse

43

3.

Roughly the same as today

351

4.

Somewhat better

400

5.

Much better

185

8.

INAP

537

9.

Missing/does not apply

1296

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-5

Range of Invalid Data Values: 8, 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 987 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q59_5. If cohabiting/married - standard of living would be...


How do you think your life would be today if you lived together with a cohabiting partner or spouse? - My standard of living would be...

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Much worse

9

2.

Somewhat worse

44

3.

Roughly the same as today

378

4.

Somewhat better

414

5.

Much better

142

8.

INAP

537

9.

Missing/does not apply

1296

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-5

Range of Invalid Data Values: 8, 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 987 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q60_1. If single - contacts with friends would be...


How do you think your life would be today if you lived alone without a partner (and without children)? - Contacts with my friends would be...

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Much worse

16

2.

Somewhat worse

31

3.

Roughly the same as today

489

4.

Somewhat better

642

5.

Much better

147

8.

INAP

537

9.

Missing/does not apply

958

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-5

Range of Invalid Data Values: 8, 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 1325 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q60_2. If single - possibilities to invest wholeheartedly in education/job/career would be...


How do you think your life would be today if you lived alone without a partner (and without children)? - My possibilities to invest wholeheartedly in education/job/career would be...

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Much worse

19

2.

Somewhat worse

44

3.

Roughly the same as today

704

4.

Somewhat better

372

5.

Much better

178

8.

INAP

537

9.

Missing/does not apply

966

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-5

Range of Invalid Data Values: 8, 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 1317 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q60_3. If single - freedom to do what one wants would be...


How do you think your life would be today if you lived alone without a partner (and without children)? - My freedom to do what I want would be...

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Much worse

13

2.

Somewhat worse

30

3.

Roughly the same as today

594

4.

Somewhat better

465

5.

Much better

207

8.

INAP

537

9.

Missing/does not apply

974

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-5

Range of Invalid Data Values: 8, 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 1309 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q60_4. If single - general well-being would be...


How do you think your life would be today if you lived alone without a partner (and without children)? - My general well-being would be...

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Much worse

292

2.

Somewhat worse

473

3.

Roughly the same as today

480

4.

Somewhat better

47

5.

Much better

15

8.

INAP

537

9.

Missing/does not apply

976

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-5

Range of Invalid Data Values: 8, 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 1307 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q60_5. If single - standard of living would be...


How do you think your life would be today if you lived alone without a partner (and without children)? - My standard of living would be...

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Much worse

155

2.

Somewhat worse

418

3.

Roughly the same as today

527

4.

Somewhat better

166

5.

Much better

43

8.

INAP

537

9.

Missing/does not apply

974

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-5

Range of Invalid Data Values: 8, 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 1309 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q61_1. Marriage for the sake of children


Here are some reasons for and against marriage. What is your wiew? - People ought to get married for the sake of their children

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

1 - Don't agree at all

1644

2.

2

367

3.

3

305

4.

4

230

5.

5 - I agree completely

149

6.

Don't know

47

9.

Missing

78

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-6

Range of Invalid Data Values: 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 2742 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q61_2. Marriage for economic reasons


Here are some reasons for and against marriage. What is your wiew? - People ought to get married for economic reasons

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

1 - Don't agree at all

1779

2.

2

398

3.

3

291

4.

4

119

5.

5 - I agree completely

39

6.

Don't know

113

9.

Missing

81

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-6

Range of Invalid Data Values: 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 2739 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q61_3. Married - more traditional gender roles


Here are some reasons for and against marriage. What is your wiew? - When married, one is more inclined to traditional gender roles

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

1 - Don't agree at all

1050

2.

2

471

3.

3

556

4.

4

215

5.

5 - I agree completely

82

6.

Don't know

355

9.

Missing

91

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-6

Range of Invalid Data Values: 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 2729 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q61_4. Married - preassure to conform


Here are some reasons for and against marriage. What is your wiew? - The married are under greater preassure to conform

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

1 - Don't agree at all

1016

2.

2

471

3.

3

522

4.

4

292

5.

5 - I agree completely

114

6.

Don't know

314

9.

Missing

91

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-6

Range of Invalid Data Values: 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 2729 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q61_5. Married - more difficult to break up


Here are some reasons for and against marriage. What is your wiew? - As married, it is more difficult to break up from an unsatisfactory relationship

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

1 - Don't agree at all

324

2.

2

270

3.

3

564

4.

4

851

5.

5 - I agree completely

527

6.

Don't know

195

9.

Missing

89

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-6

Range of Invalid Data Values: 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 2731 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q61_6. It is tradition to get married


Here are some reasons for and against marriage. What is your wiew? - It is tradition to get married

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

1 - Don't agree at all

455

2.

2

325

3.

3

668

4.

4

705

5.

5 - I agree completely

489

6.

Don't know

81

9.

Missing

97

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-6

Range of Invalid Data Values: 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 2723 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q61_7. It is romantic to get married


Here are some reasons for and against marriage. What is your wiew? - It is romantic to get married

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

1 - Don't agree at all

116

2.

2

109

3.

3

417

4.

4

824

5.

5 - I agree completely

1177

6.

Don't know

70

9.

Missing

107

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-6

Range of Invalid Data Values: 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 2713 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q61_8. Wedding shows that one is serious


Here are some reasons for and against marriage. What is your wiew? - The wedding ceremony shows that one is really serious about the relationship

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

1 - Don't agree at all

278

2.

2

157

3.

3

320

4.

4

613

5.

5 - I agree completely

1316

6.

Don't know

46

9.

Missing

90

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-6

Range of Invalid Data Values: 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 2730 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q62_1. Appropriate as parent - likes children


How important are the following to begin having children? - That one likes children

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

1 - Unimportant

15

2.

2

16

3.

3

101

4.

4

409

5.

5 - Very important

1694

6.

Don't know

12

8.

Not asked

537

9.

Missing

36

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-6

Range of Invalid Data Values: 8, 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 2247 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q62_2. Appropriate as parent - lives in a good partner relationship


How important are the following to begin having children? - That one lives in a good partner relationship

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

1 - Unimportant

21

2.

2

29

3.

3

103

4.

4

370

5.

5 - Very important

1712

6.

Don't know

14

8.

Not asked

537

9.

Missing

34

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-9

Range of Invalid Data Values: 8, 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 2249 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q62_3. Appropriate as parent - completed education


How important are the following to begin having children? - That one has completed one's education

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

1 - Unimportant

245

2.

2

253

3.

3

651

4.

4

577

5.

5 - Very important

486

6.

Don't know

31

8.

Not asked

537

9.

Missing

40

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-6

Range of Invalid Data Values: 8, 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 2243 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q62_4. Appropriate as parent - housing suitable for children


How important are the following to begin having children? - That one has housing suitable for children

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

1 - Unimportant

24

2.

2

79

3.

3

331

4.

4

762

5.

5 - Very important

1044

6.

Don't know

8

8.

Not asked

537

9.

Missing

35

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-6

Range of Invalid Data Values: 8, 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 2248 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q62_5. Appropriate as parent - sufficient income


How important are the following to begin having children? - That one has a sufficient income to support a child

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

1 - Unimportant

6

2.

2

22

3.

3

119

4.

4

536

5.

5 - Very important

1559

6.

Don't know

7

8.

Not asked

537

9.

Missing

34

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-6

Range of Invalid Data Values: 8, 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 2249 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q63_1. R has housing suitable for children


Do you think that the following things apply to you right now? - My housing situation is suitable for children

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Yes

1200

2.

No

1030

8.

Not asked

537

9.

Missing

53

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-2

Range of Invalid Data Values: 8, 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 2230 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q63_2. R has completed education


Do you think that the following things apply to you right now? - I have completed my education

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Yes

1203

2.

No

1018

8.

Not asked

537

9.

Missing

62

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-2

Range of Invalid Data Values: 8, 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 2221 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q63_3. R has a sufficient income to support a child


Do you think that the following things apply to you right now? - I have a sufficient income to support a child

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Yes

1330

2.

No

891

8.

Not asked

537

9.

Missing

62

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-2

Range of Invalid Data Values: 8, 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 2221 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q64_1. R has not wanted children


There may be many reasons to not have had children (yet). Does any of these apply to you? - I have not wanted children (yet)

Value

Label

Frequency

0.

Not marked

1188

1.

Marked

1095

8.

Not asked

537

Range of Valid Data Values: 0-1

Range of Invalid Data Values: 8

Summary Statistics: Valid 2283 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q64_2. R has not had a suitable partner


There may be many reasons to not have had children (yet). Does any of these apply to you? - I have not had a suitable partner to have children with

Value

Label

Frequency

0.

Not marked

1605

1.

Marked

678

8.

Not asked

537

Range of Valid Data Values: 0-1

Range of Invalid Data Values: 8

Summary Statistics: Valid 2283 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q64_3. R first wants to complete education


There may be many reasons to not have had children (yet). Does any of these apply to you? - I first wanted to complete my education

Value

Label

Frequency

0.

Not marked

1658

1.

Marked

625

8.

Not asked

537

Range of Valid Data Values: 0-1

Range of Invalid Data Values: 8

Summary Statistics: Valid 2283 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q64_4. R first wanted secure job situation


There may be many reasons to not have had children (yet). Does any of these apply to you? - I first wanted to have a secure job situation

Value

Label

Frequency

0.

Not marked

1628

1.

Marked

655

8.

Not asked

537

Range of Valid Data Values: 0-1

Range of Invalid Data Values: 8

Summary Statistics: Valid 2283 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q64_5. R first wanted to get well established in job


There may be many reasons to not have had children (yet). Does any of these apply to you? - I first wanted to get well established in my job

Value

Label

Frequency

0.

Not marked

1951

1.

Marked

332

8.

Not asked

537

Range of Valid Data Values: 0-1

Range of Invalid Data Values: 8

Summary Statistics: Valid 2283 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q64_6. R first wanted to do other things before having children


There may be many reasons to not have had children (yet). Does any of these apply to you? - I wanted to do other things before I have children

Value

Label

Frequency

0.

Not marked

1317

1.

Marked

966

8.

Not asked

537

Range of Valid Data Values: 0-1

Range of Invalid Data Values: 8

Summary Statistics: Valid 2283 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q64_7. R first wanted to have a better economic situation


There may be many reasons to not have had children (yet). Does any of these apply to you? - I first wanted to have a better economic situation

Value

Label

Frequency

0.

Not marked

1486

1.

Marked

797

8.

Not asked

537

Range of Valid Data Values: 0-1

Range of Invalid Data Values: 8

Summary Statistics: Valid 2283 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q64_8. Other...


There may be many reasons to not have had children (yet). Does any of these apply to you? - Other reasons

Value

Label

Frequency

0.

Not marked

2129

1.

Marked

154

8.

Not asked

537

Range of Valid Data Values: 0-1

Range of Invalid Data Values: 8

Summary Statistics: Valid 2283 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q64txt. Comment available


Comment

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

150

Sysmiss.

2670

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-1

Summary Statistics: Valid 150 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q65_1. In five years R has more children


What do you think your life will be like in five years? - You have (more) children

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Yes

1132

2.

Maybe

795

3.

No

522

4.

Don't know

286

9.

Missing

85

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-4

Range of Invalid Data Values: 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 2735 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q65_2. In five years R lives with a partner


What do you think your life will be like in five years? - You live with a partner

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Yes

2021

2.

Maybe

530

3.

No

46

4.

Don't know

145

9.

Missing

78

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-4

Range of Invalid Data Values: 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 2742 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q65_3. In five years R is married


What do you think your life will be like in five years? - You are married

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Yes

919

2.

Maybe

829

3.

No

687

4.

Don't know

307

9.

Missing

78

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-4

Range of Invalid Data Values: 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 2742 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q65_4. In five years R has a steady job


What do you think your life will be like in five years? - You have a steady job

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Yes

1927

2.

Maybe

573

3.

No

85

4.

Don't know

160

9.

Missing

75

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-4

Range of Invalid Data Values: 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 2745 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q65_5. In five years R is working part-time to have time for family


What do you think your life will be like in five years? - You work part-time to have time for your family

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Yes

358

2.

Maybe

758

3.

No

1137

4.

Don't know

422

9.

Missing

145

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-4

Range of Invalid Data Values: 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 2675 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q65_6. In five years R earns a lot of money


What do you think your life will be like in five years? - You earn a lot of money

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Yes

975

2.

Maybe

1212

3.

No

332

4.

Don't know

240

9.

Missing

61

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-4

Range of Invalid Data Values: 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 2759 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q65_7. In five years R lives a good life


What do you think your life will be like in five years? - You live a good life

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Yes

2322

2.

Maybe

365

3.

No

5

4.

Don't know

86

9.

Missing

42

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-4

Range of Invalid Data Values: 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 2778 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q66. R lives together with partner


Do you and your partner live together right now?

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Yes

1485

2.

No

586

9.

Missing/does not apply

749

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-2

Range of Invalid Data Values: 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 2071 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q67a. Year when R moved in with partner


When did you move in with your partner? - Year

Value

Label

Frequency

23.

23

2

82.

1982

1

84.

1984

2

85.

1985

2

86.

1986

13

87.

1987

33

88.

1988

29

89.

1989

50

90.

1990

80

91.

1991

114

92.

1992

82

93.

1993

107

94.

1994

128

95.

1995

142

96.

1996

180

97.

1997

175

98.

1998

238

99.

1999

67

Sysmiss.

1375

Range of Valid Data Values: 23-99

Summary Statistics: Valid 1445 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q67b. Month when R moved in with partner


When did you move in with your partner? - Month

Value

Label

Frequency

0.

1

1.

January

114

2.

February

95

3.

March

94

4.

April

96

5.

May

95

6.

June

133

7.

July

67

8.

August

154

9.

September

106

10.

October

85

11.

November

67

12.

December

92

21.

Winter

61

22.

Spring

62

23.

Summer

82

24.

Autumn

26

Sysmiss.

1390

Range of Valid Data Values: 0-24

Summary Statistics: Valid 1430 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q68a. R is married to partner


Are you married? - Yes/no

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Yes

353

2.

No

1585

9.

Missing/does not apply

882

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-2

Range of Invalid Data Values: 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 1938 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q68b. Year when married


Are you married? - Year

Value

Label

Frequency

87.

1987

2

88.

1988

4

89.

1989

11

90.

1990

9

91.

1991

22

92.

1992

23

93.

1993

29

94.

1994

34

95.

1995

51

96.

1996

60

97.

1997

57

98.

1998

72

99.

1999

10

Sysmiss.

2436

Range of Valid Data Values: 87-99

Summary Statistics: Valid 384 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q68c. Month when married


Are you married? - Month

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

January

15

2.

February

13

3.

March

7

4.

April

13

5.

May

40

6.

June

79

7.

July

81

8.

August

73

9.

September

26

10.

October

11

11.

November

8

12.

December

15

22.

Spring

1

Sysmiss.

2438

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-22

Summary Statistics: Valid 382 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q69. Partners age


How old is your partner?

Value

Label

Frequency

0.

0

1

12.

12

1

14.

14

1

16.

16

2

17.

17

3

18.

18

9

19.

19

18

20.

20

53

21.

21

72

22.

22

105

23.

23

133

24.

24

139

25.

25

150

26.

26

183

27.

27

185

28.

28

140

29.

29

123

30.

30

131

31.

31

100

32.

32

112

33.

33

74

34.

34

72

35.

35

39

36.

36

34

37.

37

16

38.

38

21

39.

39

9

40.

40

8

41.

41

8

42.

42

6

43.

43

7

44.

44

2

45.

45

1

46.

46

2

47.

47

3

48.

48

1

50.

50

1

51.

51

2

54.

54

1

55.

55

1

Range of Valid Data Values: 0-55

Summary Statistics: Valid 1969 ; Min. 0 ; Max. 55 ; Mean 27.725 ; StDev 5.045

Variable Format: numeric


Q70_1. Partner - Permanent work


Partners occupation at the moment - Permanent work

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Marked

1066

Sysmiss.

1754

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-1

Summary Statistics: Valid 1066 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q70_2. Partner - Casual work


Partners occupation at the moment - Casual work

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Marked

266

Sysmiss.

2554

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-1

Summary Statistics: Valid 266 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q70_3. Partner - Own business


Partners occupation at the moment - Own business, free-lance or similar

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Marked

135

Sysmiss.

2685

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-1

Summary Statistics: Valid 135 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q70_4. Partner - Studies


Partners occupation at the moment - Studies

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Marked

449

Sysmiss.

2371

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-1

Summary Statistics: Valid 449 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q70_5. Partner - Kunskapslyftet


Partners occupation at the moment - Kunskapslyftet

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Marked

30

Sysmiss.

2790

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-1

Summary Statistics: Valid 30 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q70_6. Partner - Employment measures


Partners occupation at the moment - Employment measures

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Marked

20

Sysmiss.

2800

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-1

Summary Statistics: Valid 20 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q70_7. Partner - Unemployed more than 6 months


Partners occupation at the moment - Unemployed (6 months or more)

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Marked

28

Sysmiss.

2792

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-1

Summary Statistics: Valid 28 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q70_8. Partner - Unemployed less than 6 months


Partners occupation at the moment - Unemployed (less than 6 months)

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Marked

43

Sysmiss.

2777

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-1

Summary Statistics: Valid 43 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q70_9. Partner - Parental leave


Partners occupation at the moment - Parental leave

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Marked

104

Sysmiss.

2716

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-1

Summary Statistics: Valid 104 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q70_10. Partner - Housekeeping


Partners occupation at the moment - Housekeeping (full-time)

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Marked

9

Sysmiss.

2811

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-1

Summary Statistics: Valid 9 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q70_11. Partner - Military service


Partners occupation at the moment - Military service

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Marked

5

Sysmiss.

2815

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-1

Summary Statistics: Valid 5 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q70_12. Partner - Other occupation


Partners occupation at the moment - Other

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Marked

62

Sysmiss.

2758

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-1

Summary Statistics: Valid 62 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q70txt. Comment available


Partners occupation at the moment - Comment

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Comment available

55

Sysmiss.

2765

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-1

Summary Statistics: Valid 55 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q71. Partner's working hours


How many hours per week does your partner work right now?

Range of Valid Data Values: 0-99

Summary Statistics: Valid 1476 ; Min. 0 ; Max. 99 ; Mean 38.428 ; StDev 12.424

Variable Format: numeric


Q72_1. Partner's job pays well


What applies to your partner's current job? - It pays well

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Applies completely

380

2.

Applies partially

736

3.

Does not apply at all

315

4.

Don't know

37

9.

Missing/does not apply

1352

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-4

Range of Invalid Data Values: 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 1468 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q72_2. Partner's job - a lot of overtime


What applies to your partner's current job? - It involves a lot of overtime work

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Applies completely

264

2.

Applies partially

579

3.

Does not apply at all

575

4.

Don't know

46

9.

Missing/does not apply

1356

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-4

Range of Invalid Data Values: 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 1464 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q72_3. Partner's job - a lot of business travel


What applies to your partner's current job? - It involves a lot of business travel

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Applies completely

147

2.

Applies partially

312

3.

Does not apply at all

954

4.

Don't know

36

9.

Missing/does not apply

1371

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-4

Range of Invalid Data Values: 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 1449 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q72_4. Partner's job - a lot of work at inconvenient hours


What applies to your partner's current job? - It involves work at night, in the evening and/or on weekends

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Applies completely

361

2.

Applies partially

449

3.

Does not apply at all

612

4.

Don't know

34

9.

Missing/does not apply

1364

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-4

Range of Invalid Data Values: 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 1456 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q72_5. Partner's job - good career possibilities


What applies to your partner's current job? - It provides good career possibilities

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Applies completely

297

2.

Applies partially

469

3.

Does not apply at all

593

4.

Don't know

95

9.

Missing/does not apply

1366

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-4

Range of Invalid Data Values: 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 1454 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q72_6. Partner's job - easy to take parental leave and work part time


What applies to your partner's current job? - It makes it easy to take parental leave and/or work part time to have time for one's family

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Applies completely

350

2.

Applies partially

526

3.

Does not apply at all

356

4.

Don't know

222

9.

Missing/does not apply

1366

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-4

Range of Invalid Data Values: 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 1454 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q72_7. Partner's job - long travel time to and from work


What applies to your partner's current job? - It involves long travel time to and from work

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Applies completely

147

2.

Applies partially

290

3.

Does not apply at all

980

4.

Don't know

37

9.

Missing/does not apply

1366

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-4

Range of Invalid Data Values: 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 1454 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q73. Partner's education


What is your partner's level of education?

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

<= nine years

117

2.

Upper secondary, vocational 1-3 years

601

3.

Upper secondary, theoretical 3-4 years

417

4.

Interrupted upper secondary education

43

5.

Post-gymnasium without degree

261

6.

Post-gymnasium with degree

366

7.

Other...

117

8.

Don't know

40

9.

Missing/does not apply

858

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-8

Range of Invalid Data Values: 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 1962 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q73txt. Comment available


Partner's education - Comment

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Comment available

125

Sysmiss.

2695

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-1

Summary Statistics: Valid 125 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q74. Partner's place of birth


In which country was your partner born?

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Sweden

1752

2.

Poland (concerns R with polish/turkish background)

6

3.

Turkey (concerns R with polish/turkish background)

51

4.

Other Nordic country (than Sweden)

42

5.

Europe

69

6.

Asia/Africa/Latin America

50

9.

Missing/does not apply

850

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-6

Range of Invalid Data Values: 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 1970 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q75a. Partner's parents immigrated to Sweden


Have any of your parents immigrated to Sweden? - No/yes

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

No

1717

2.

Yes

239

9.

Missing/does not apply

864

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-2

Range of Invalid Data Values: 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 1956 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q75b_1. Partner's parents immigrated from Poland (concerns R with polish/turkish background)


Have any of your partner's parents immigrated to Sweden? If so, from where? - Poland (concerns R with polish/turkish background)

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Marked

14

Sysmiss.

2806

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-1

Summary Statistics: Valid 14 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q75b_2. Partner's parents immigrated from Turkey (concerns R with polish/turkish background)


Have any of your partner's parents immigrated to Sweden? If so, from where? - Turkey (concerns R with polish/turkish background)

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Marked

25

Sysmiss.

2795

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-1

Summary Statistics: Valid 25 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q75b_3. Partner's parents immigrated from other Nordic country


Have any of your partner's parents immigrated to Sweden? If so, from where? - Other Nordic country (than Sweden)

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Marked

104

Sysmiss.

2716

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-1

Summary Statistics: Valid 104 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q75b_4. Partner's parents immigrated from Europe


Have any of your partner's parents immigrated to Sweden? If so, from where? - Europe outside the Nordic countries, Australia, North America

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Marked

77

Sysmiss.

2743

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-1

Summary Statistics: Valid 77 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q75b_5. Partner's parents immigrated from Asia/Africa/Latin America


Have any of your partner's parents immigrated to Sweden? If so, from where? - Asia, Africa, Latin America

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Marked

30

Sysmiss.

2790

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-1

Summary Statistics: Valid 30 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q76. Partner member of religious congregation


Is your partner member of the Swedish state church or some other religious congregation?

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Yes

1423

2.

No

541

9.

Missing/does not apply

856

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-2

Range of Invalid Data Values: 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 1964 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q77_1. Partner member of Swedish state church


Which congregation? - Swedish state church

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Marked

1289

Sysmiss.

1531

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-1

Summary Statistics: Valid 1289 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q77_2. Partner member of "Free churches"


Which congregation? - "Free churches"

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Marked

56

Sysmiss.

2764

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-1

Summary Statistics: Valid 56 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q77_3. Partner member of Catholic church


Which congregation? - Catholic church

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Marked

28

Sysmiss.

2792

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-1

Summary Statistics: Valid 28 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q77_4. Partner member of orthodox church


Which congregation? - Orthodox church

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Marked

18

Sysmiss.

2802

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-1

Summary Statistics: Valid 18 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q77_5. Partner member of Jewish congregation


Which congregation? - Jewish congregation

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Marked

4

Sysmiss.

2816

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-1

Summary Statistics: Valid 4 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q77_6. Partner member of muslim congregation


Which congregation? - Muslim congregation

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Marked

23

Sysmiss.

2797

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-1

Summary Statistics: Valid 23 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q77_7. Partner member of other religious congregation


Which congregation? - Other religious congregation

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Marked

16

Sysmiss.

2804

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-1

Summary Statistics: Valid 16 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q78. Importance of religion in partner's life


How important would you say that religion is in your partner's life?

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Very important

103

2.

Rather important

140

3.

Of little or no importance

1634

4.

Don't know

87

9.

Missing/does not apply

856

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-4

Range of Invalid Data Values: 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 1964 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q79. R/partner pregnant


Is you or your partner pregnant?

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Yes

137

2.

No

1801

3.

Don't know

42

9.

Missing/does not apply

840

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-3

Range of Invalid Data Values: 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 1980 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q80. Partner has children not living in household


Does your partner have children who are living somewhere else?

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Yes

107

2.

No

1854

9.

Missing/does not apply

859

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-2

Range of Invalid Data Values: 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 1961 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q81. What would happen if your partner got an offer ...


What do you think would happen if your partner was offered a permanent, well-paid job in some other location?

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

He/she would turn the offer down

403

2.

I would naturally move too (even if it meant quitting my job)

230

3.

I would ask for leave of absence and accompany him/her to give it a try

132

4.

We would see each other only on weekends for a while, while I looked for a job at the new location

256

5.

We would have a LAT-relationship

125

6.

We would break up

20

7.

Something else...

86

8.

Don't know

368

9.

Missing/does not apply

663

88.

Not asked

537

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-8

Range of Invalid Data Values: 9, 88

Summary Statistics: Valid 1620 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q81txt. Comment available


What do you think would happen if your partner was offered a permanent, well-paid job in some other location? - Comment

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Comment available

86

Sysmiss.

2734

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-1

Summary Statistics: Valid 86 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q82. Marriage plans


Do you and your partner plan to get married?

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Yes, within the next two years

232

2.

Yes, later on

504

3.

No

560

4.

Don't know

278

9.

Missing/does not apply

1246

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-4

Range of Invalid Data Values: 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 1574 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q83. Is there something you would like to add?


Is there something you would like to add?

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Marked

473

Sysmiss.

2347

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-1

Summary Statistics: Valid 473 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q83txt. Comment available


Is there something you would like to add? - Comment

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Comment available

488

Sysmiss.

2332

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-1

Summary Statistics: Valid 488 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q91. Respondents citizenship


What is your citizenship?

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Swedish

474

2.

Polish/turkish

21

3.

Other

2

8.

Not asked

2283

9.

Missed

40

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-3

Range of Invalid Data Values: 8, 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 497 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q92. Year R became Swedish citizen


Which year did you become a Swedish citizenship?

Value

Label

Frequency

72.

1972

80

74.

1974

3

76.

1976

160

77.

1977

11

78.

1978

3

79.

1979

7

80.

1980

5

81.

1981

3

82.

1982

6

83.

1983

2

85.

1985

2

86.

1986

3

87.

1987

2

88.

1988

4

89.

1989

2

90.

1990

5

91.

1991

2

92.

1992

6

93.

1993

13

94.

1994

7

95.

1995

11

96.

1996

5

97.

1997

12

98.

1998

14

99.

1999

4

Range of Valid Data Values: 72-99

Summary Statistics: Valid 372 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q93. Plans to apply for Swedish citizenship


Do you plan to apply for Swedish citizenship in the future?

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Yes, definitely

17

2.

Yes, probably

3

3.

Uncertain

3

4.

No, probably not

0

5.

No, absolutely not

6

8.

Not asked

2283

9.

Missing/does not apply

508

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-5

Range of Invalid Data Values: 8, 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 29 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q94. Visited home country last ten years


How often have you visited your home country in the last ten years?

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Never

100

2.

Only once or twice

148

3.

Roughly every second year

103

4.

Every year

68

5.

More than once a year

21

8.

Not asked

2283

9.

Missing

97

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-5

Range of Invalid Data Values: 8, 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 440 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q95. Time R has spent in hhome country altogether


How much time altogether have you spent in the home country?

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

No time at all

132

2.

Less than a year

201

3.

1-5 years

71

4.

More than 5 years

24

8.

Not asked

2283

9.

Missing

109

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-4

Range of Invalid Data Values: 8, 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 428 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q96. Knowledge of home language


HOw is your knowledge of your home language?

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Very poor

121

2.

Rather poor

72

3.

Rather good

171

4.

Very good

81

8.

Not asked

2283

9.

Missing

92

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-4

Range of Invalid Data Values: 8, 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 445 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q97. R wants his/her children to learn his/her home language


Do you want your children to learn your home language?

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

No, absolutely not

33

2.

No, preferably not

8

3.

Does not matter

146

4.

Yes, preferably

125

5.

Yes, absolutely

134

8.

Not asked

2283

9.

Missing

91

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-5

Range of Invalid Data Values: 8, 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 446 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q98_1. R speaks with mother


What language do you mostly speak with your mother?

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Only home language

104

2.

Both Swedish and home language

142

3.

Only Swedish

195

4.

INAP

16

8.

Not asked

2283

9.

Missing

80

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-3

Range of Invalid Data Values: 4, 8, 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 441 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q98_2. R speaks with father


What language do you mostly speak with your father?

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Only home language

98

2.

Both Swedish and home language

113

3.

Only Swedish

191

4.

INAP

54

8.

Not asked

2283

9.

Missing

81

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-3

Range of Invalid Data Values: 4, 8, 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 402 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q98_3. R speaks with partner


What language do you mostly speak with your partner?

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Only home language

31

2.

Both Swedish and home language

46

3.

Only Swedish

209

4.

INAP

144

8.

Not asked

2283

9.

Missing

107

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-93

Range of Invalid Data Values: 4, 8, 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 286 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q98_4. R speaks at work/in school


What language do you mostly speak at work/in school?

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Only home language

2

2.

Both Swedish and home language

31

3.

Only Swedish

390

4.

INAP

23

8.

Not asked

2283

9.

Missing

91

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-3

Range of Invalid Data Values: 4, 8, 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 423 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q99. R feels most at home


Where do you feel most at home?

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

In Sweden

374

2.

In home country

10

3.

As much (or as little) in both

75

8.

Not asked

2283

9.

Missing

78

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-3

Range of Invalid Data Values: 8, 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 459 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q100. Marry or cohabit with a partner whose parents are also from Poland/Turkey


How important is it for you to marry (or cohabit with) a partner whose parents are also from Poland/Turkey?

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Not at all important

280

2.

Rather important

36

3.

Very important

34

4.

Don't know

20

8.

Not asked

2283

9.

Missing/does not apply

167

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-4

Range of Invalid Data Values: 8, 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 370 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q101. Parents would approve if R married a Swede


Do you think your parents would approve if you married a Swede?

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

No, not at all

20

2.

Doubtful

55

3.

Yes, completely

293

8.

Not asked

2283

9.

Missing/does not apply

169

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-3

Range of Invalid Data Values: 8, 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 368 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q102. Close contacts with the home country


How important is it for you to maintain close contacts with the home country?

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Not particularly important

209

2.

Rather important

139

3.

Very important

102

8.

Not asked

2283

9.

Missing

87

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-3

Range of Invalid Data Values: 8, 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 450 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q103. Important for parents that R maintain close contacts with the home country


How important do you think it is to your parents that you maintain close contacts with the home country?

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

No not particularly important

196

2.

Rather important

141

3.

Very important

112

8.

Not asked

2283

9.

Missing

88

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-3

Range of Invalid Data Values: 8, 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 449 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q104. R:s residential area


When you were growing up, were there mostly Swedes, mostly immigrants or roughly half and half in your residential area?

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

Mostly Swedes

331

2.

Mostly immigrants

43

3.

Roughly equal

88

8.

Not asked

2283

9.

Missing

75

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-3

Range of Invalid Data Values: 8, 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 462 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q105_1. At home R feels


You can feel more or less Swedish in different situations. How would you describe your feelings on a scale from 1 to 5? - At home

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

1 - Not at all Swedish

66

2.

2

33

3.

3

71

4.

4

56

5.

5 - Very Swedish

187

6.

Don't know

11

8.

Not asked

2283

9.

Missing

113

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-6

Range of Invalid Data Values: 8, 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 424 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q105_2. At work/in school R feels


You can feel more or less Swedish in different situations. How would you describe your feelings on a scale from 1 to 5? - At work/in school

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

1 - Not at all Swedish

17

2.

2

22

3.

3

55

4.

4

75

5.

5 - Very Swedish

246

6.

Don't know

9

8.

Not asked

2283

9.

Missing

113

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-6

Range of Invalid Data Values: 8, 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 424 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q105_3. With friends R feels


You can feel more or less Swedish in different situations. How would you describe your feelings on a scale from 1 to 5? - With friends

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

1 - Not at all Swedish

27

2.

2

20

3.

3

74

4.

4

85

5.

5 - Very Swedish

205

6.

Don't know

8

8.

Not asked

2283

9.

Missing

118

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-6

Range of Invalid Data Values: 8, 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 419 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q105_4. In contact with Swedish authorities R feels


You can feel more or less Swedish in different situations. How would you describe your feelings on a scale from 1 to 5? - In contact with Swedish authorities

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

1 - Not at all Swedish

30

2.

2

18

3.

3

50

4.

4

58

5.

5 - Very Swedish

258

6.

Don't know

8

8.

Not asked

2283

9.

Missing

115

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-6

Range of Invalid Data Values: 8, 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 422 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q105_5. In home country R feels


You can feel more or less Swedish in different situations. How would you describe your feelings on a scale from 1 to 5? - In home country

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

1 - Not at all Swedish

38

2.

2

21

3.

3

69

4.

4

64

5.

5 - Very Swedish

189

6.

Don't know

37

8.

Not asked

2283

9.

Missing

119

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-6

Range of Invalid Data Values: 8, 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 418 ;

Variable Format: numeric


Q105_6. Abroad R feels


You can feel more or less Swedish in different situations. How would you describe your feelings on a scale from 1 to 5? - Abroad (not home country)

Value

Label

Frequency

1.

1 - Not at all Swedish

35

2.

2

21

3.

3

64

4.

4

56

5.

5 - Very Swedish

218

6.

Don't know

26

8.

Not asked

2283

9.

Missing

117

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-6

Range of Invalid Data Values: 8, 9

Summary Statistics: Valid 420 ;

Variable Format: numeric