Effectiveness of cervical screening after age 60 according to screening history: nationwide cohort study

The relatively high incidence of cervical cancer in women at older ages is an issue in countries performing cervical screening for decades. Controversy remains on when and how to cease screening. Existing population-based studies on effectiveness of cervical screening at older ages have not considered women’s screening history. We performed a nationwide cohort study to investigate the incidence of cervical cancer after age 60 and its association with cervical screening at ages 61-65, stratified by screening history at ages 51-60.
Using the Total Population Register, we identified women born between January 1919 and December 1945, resident in Sweden since age 51. According to the year that each county started the electronic record of cervical screening and women’s resident county, we further identified 569,132 women that have cervical screening record available since age 51. Women’s screening records, cervical cancer occurrence, and level of education were retrieved from the Swedish National Cervical Screening Registry, the National Cancer Register, and LISA (Longitudinal integration database f

... Show more..

The relatively high incidence of cervical cancer in women at older ages is an issue in countries performing cervical screening for decades. Controversy remains on when and how to cease screening. Existing population-based studies on effectiveness of cervical screening at older ages have not considered women’s screening history. We performed a nationwide cohort study to investigate the incidence of cervical cancer after age 60 and its association with cervical screening at ages 61-65, stratified by screening history at ages 51-60.
Using the Total Population Register, we identified women born between January 1919 and December 1945, resident in Sweden since age 51. According to the year that each county started the electronic record of cervical screening and women’s resident county, we further identified 569,132 women that have cervical screening record available since age 51. Women’s screening records, cervical cancer occurrence, and level of education were retrieved from the Swedish National Cervical Screening Registry, the National Cancer Register, and LISA (Longitudinal integration database for health insurance and labour market studies) respectively. We presented the cumulative incidence of cervical cancer from age 61-80 by using competing risk regression models, and compared the hazard ratio of cervical cancer by screening status at ages 61-65 from Cox models, adjusted for birth cohort and level of education, conditioning on screening history in their 50s.
We find that Cervical screening at ages 61-65 is associated with a statistically significant reduction of subsequent cervical cancer risk for women unscreened, or screened with abnormalities, in their 50s. In women screened negative in their 50s, the risk for future cancer is not sizeable, and the risk reduction associated with continued screening appears limited. These findings should inform the current debate regarding age and criteria to discontinue cervical screening.

Purpose:

In order to provide evidence for age and criteria to discontinue cervical screening, we use this data to investigate the impact of cervical screening at ages 61-65 on cervical cancer incidence and stage at ages 61-80, stratifying by screening history at ages 51-60. Show less..

The relatively high incidence of cervical cancer in women at older ages is an issue in countries performing cervical screening for decades. Controversy remains on when and how to cease screening. Existing population-based studies on effectiveness of cervical screening at older ages have not considered women’s screening history. We performed a nationwide cohort study to investigate the incidence of cervical cancer after age 60 and its association with cervical screening at ages 61-65, stratified by screening history at ages 51-60.
Using the Total Population Register, we identified women born between January 1919 and December 1945, resident in Sweden since age 51. According to the year that each county started the electronic record of cervical screening and women’s resident county, we further identified 569,132 women that have cervical screening record available since age 51. Women’s screening records, cervical cancer occurrence, and level of education were retrieved from the Swedish National Cervical Screening Registry, the National Cancer Register, and LISA (Longitudinal integration database f

... Show more..

The relatively high incidence of cervical cancer in women at older ages is an issue in countries performing cervical screening for decades. Controversy remains on when and how to cease screening. Existing population-based studies on effectiveness of cervical screening at older ages have not considered women’s screening history. We performed a nationwide cohort study to investigate the incidence of cervical cancer after age 60 and its association with cervical screening at ages 61-65, stratified by screening history at ages 51-60.
Using the Total Population Register, we identified women born between January 1919 and December 1945, resident in Sweden since age 51. According to the year that each county started the electronic record of cervical screening and women’s resident county, we further identified 569,132 women that have cervical screening record available since age 51. Women’s screening records, cervical cancer occurrence, and level of education were retrieved from the Swedish National Cervical Screening Registry, the National Cancer Register, and LISA (Longitudinal integration database for health insurance and labour market studies) respectively. We presented the cumulative incidence of cervical cancer from age 61-80 by using competing risk regression models, and compared the hazard ratio of cervical cancer by screening status at ages 61-65 from Cox models, adjusted for birth cohort and level of education, conditioning on screening history in their 50s.
We find that Cervical screening at ages 61-65 is associated with a statistically significant reduction of subsequent cervical cancer risk for women unscreened, or screened with abnormalities, in their 50s. In women screened negative in their 50s, the risk for future cancer is not sizeable, and the risk reduction associated with continued screening appears limited. These findings should inform the current debate regarding age and criteria to discontinue cervical screening.

Purpose:

In order to provide evidence for age and criteria to discontinue cervical screening, we use this data to investigate the impact of cervical screening at ages 61-65 on cervical cancer incidence and stage at ages 61-80, stratifying by screening history at ages 51-60. Show less..