Current routines for antibiotic prophylaxis prior to transrectal prostate biopsy – a national survey to all urology clinics in Sweden

SND-ID: snd1137-1. Version: 1.0. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5878/zdne-z984

Citation

Creator/Principal investigator(s)

Johan Styrke - Umeå University, Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences

Research principal

Umeå University - Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences rorId

Description

Background: The risk of infection after transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided prostate biopsies is increasing. The aim of the study was to assess the use of antibiotic prophylaxis for prostate biopsy in Sweden.

Methods: All public and private urology clinics reporting to the National Prostate Cancer Register of Sweden received a survey on TRUS-biopsy prophylaxis.

Results: Of the 84 clinics surveyed, 76 replied (90%). If no risk factors for infection were present, a single dose of ciprofloxacin 750 mg was used by 50 clinics (66%). Multiple doses of ciprofloxacin 500 or 750 mg (n=14; 18%) or a single dose of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole 160/800 mg (n=7; 9%) were other common prophylaxes. Most clinics gave the prophylaxes immediately before the biopsy (n=41; 54%). Urine dipstick was used by 30 clinics (39%) and rectal enema by six (8%). In patients with high risk of infection, the survey mirrors a large variety of regiments used.

Conclusions: The preference to use a single dose of ciprofloxacin 750 mg is in accordance with the Swedish national guidelines for patients with a low risk of infec

... Show more..
Background: The risk of infection after transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided prostate biopsies is increasing. The aim of the study was to assess the use of antibiotic prophylaxis for prostate biopsy in Sweden.

Methods: All public and private urology clinics reporting to the National Prostate Cancer Register of Sweden received a survey on TRUS-biopsy prophylaxis.

Results: Of the 84 clinics surveyed, 76 replied (90%). If no risk factors for infection were present, a single dose of ciprofloxacin 750 mg was used by 50 clinics (66%). Multiple doses of ciprofloxacin 500 or 750 mg (n=14; 18%) or a single dose of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole 160/800 mg (n=7; 9%) were other common prophylaxes. Most clinics gave the prophylaxes immediately before the biopsy (n=41; 54%). Urine dipstick was used by 30 clinics (39%) and rectal enema by six (8%). In patients with high risk of infection, the survey mirrors a large variety of regiments used.

Conclusions: The preference to use a single dose of ciprofloxacin 750 mg is in accordance with the Swedish national guidelines for patients with a low risk of infection. Better compliance to the guideline recommendation to use a urine dipstick would probably increase the number of patients classified as having an increased risk of infection. Being classified as a high-risk patient should lead to an extended duration of antibiotic prophylaxis, however, the variety of regimens used in the high-risk group reflects an inability to treat these patients in a standardized fashion and also highlights a need for more clear-cut guidelines. Pre-biopsy identification of high-risk patients is an important issue to tackle for the urologic clinics in order to reduce the number of infections.

Data are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Zero "No rights reserved" data waiver (CC0 1.0 Public domain dedication).

Survey data methodology
Current routines for antibiotic prophylaxis prior to transrectal prostate biopsy – a national survey to all urology clinics in Sweden

An electronic survey was distributed to all of the hospitals and outpatient urology clinics reporting to the national Swedish National Prostate Cancer Register (NPCR). The web-based Information Network for CAncer registers in Sweden (INCA) platform was used for reporting. Recipients of the survey were the trained staff reporting to the NPCR or the heads of department if contact with the staff could not be established. In one case, where neither of these recipients could be reached, the survey was distributed to a urologist known by the authors at the clinic in question. The questionnaires were distributed 2014-11-26 and after up to three reminders per e-mail, the last response was collected 2015-11-03. Data from the survey was downloaded into Microsoft Excel 2011 (Microsoft Corp., Redmond, WA) and exported to SPSS Statistics 23 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL) for further analysis. Show less..

Language

Method and outcome

Population

No patient data are reported. All clinics reporting to the National prostate cancer register answered questions on clinic routines.

Study design

Observational study

Description of study design

Survey

Sampling procedure

Total universe/Complete enumeration
The survey was sent to al clinics reporting to the National prostate cancer register.

Time period(s) investigated

2006-01-01 – 2014-12-31

Variables

27

Data format / data structure

Data collection
  • Mode of collection: Self-administered questionnaire
  • Time period(s) for data collection: 2014-11-26 – 2015-11-03
  • Source of the data: Communications: Interpersonal, Research data: Unpublished, Communications, Research data
Geographic coverage

Geographic spread

Geographic location: Sweden

Geographic description: Hela Sverige

Lowest geographic unit

Region

Highest geographic unit

Country

Administrative information

Responsible department/unit

Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences

Contributor(s)

Sven Resare - Umeå University, Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences

Karl-Johan Lundström - Umeå University, Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences

Christofer Lagerros - Umeå University, Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences

Pär Stattin - Umeå University, Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences orcid

Funding 1

  • Funding agency: Region Västernorrland

Funding 2

  • Funding agency: National Prostate Cancer Register (NPCR) of Sweden

Ethics Review

Umeå - Ref. 2016/228-31

Topic and keywords

Research area

Urology and nephrology (Standard för svensk indelning av forskningsämnen 2011)

Publications
Published: 2020-01-20
Last updated: 2020-01-21